Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:3d09edf4deffde235a3acabcf17a92eb

ZIAJA, Sebastian, Jörn GRÄVINGHOLT, Merle KREIBAUM, 2019. Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States. In: Studies in Comparative International Development. 54(2), pp. 299-321. ISSN 0039-3606. eISSN 1936-6167. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s12116-019-09284-3

@article{Ziaja2019-06Const-46268, title={Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States}, year={2019}, doi={10.1007/s12116-019-09284-3}, number={2}, volume={54}, issn={0039-3606}, journal={Studies in Comparative International Development}, pages={299--321}, author={Ziaja, Sebastian and Grävingholt, Jörn and Kreibaum, Merle} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Ziaja, Sebastian</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:title>Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States</dcterms:title> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Grävingholt, Jörn</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Ziaja, Sebastian</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We present a typology of states that distinguishes constellations of state fragility based on empirical patterns. State fragility is here defined as deficiencies in one or more of three core functions of the state. These functions include violence control, implementation capacity, and empirical legitimacy. Violence control refers to the state’s ability to manage the uses of violence within society. Implementation capacity refers to the state’s ability to provide basic public services. Empirical legitimacy refers to the population’s consent to the state’s claim to rule. Employing three to four indicators per dimension for 171 countries over the period 2005–2015 and finite mixture model clustering, we find six dominant constellations that represent different types of state dysfunctionality.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2019-07-09T13:57:01Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Kreibaum, Merle</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2019-06</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Grävingholt, Jörn</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Kreibaum, Merle</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2019-07-09T13:57:01Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Jul 9, 2019 (Information about access statistics)

Ziaja_2-12iscss4cri08.pdf 269

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search KOPS


My Account