KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Validating Psychometric Questionnaires Using Experience-Sampling Data : The Case of Nightmare Distress

Validating Psychometric Questionnaires Using Experience-Sampling Data : The Case of Nightmare Distress

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:8909aaf833dbffa9748aaf785119cb4b

STIEGER, Stefan, Tim KUHLMANN, 2018. Validating Psychometric Questionnaires Using Experience-Sampling Data : The Case of Nightmare Distress. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience. 12, 901. ISSN 1662-4548. eISSN 1662-453X. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00901

@article{Stieger2018-12-05Valid-44412, title={Validating Psychometric Questionnaires Using Experience-Sampling Data : The Case of Nightmare Distress}, year={2018}, doi={10.3389/fnins.2018.00901}, volume={12}, issn={1662-4548}, journal={Frontiers in Neuroscience}, author={Stieger, Stefan and Kuhlmann, Tim}, note={Article Number: 901} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44412"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:creator>Kuhlmann, Tim</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/page/termsofuse"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Validating Psychometric Questionnaires Using Experience-Sampling Data : The Case of Nightmare Distress</dcterms:title> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44412/3/Stieger_2-1r3y6ixiiehev6.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44412"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-01-04T09:40:58Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Stieger, Stefan</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Kuhlmann, Tim</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2018-12-05</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-01-04T09:40:58Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Nightmares are a comparatively frequent phenomenon. They are often accompanied by emotional distress and gain clinical relevance when recurrent. To assess how much distress nightmares cause the individual, the Nightmare Distress Questionnaire (NDQ, Belicki, 1992) is probably the most often used measure. However, its validity is still disputed. To analyze the validity of the proposed three NDQ subscales in more detail, we conducted an experience sampling study, gathering data either in real-time or short retrospective timeframes over the course of 22 days twice per day (N = 92 participants). The measurements were implemented via a mobile app using participants’ own smartphones. Besides the dream quality, we assessed concepts on a daily basis that past research found to be related to dreams. These included critical life events, alcohol consumption, eating behavior, and well-being. We found that only the subscales “general nightmare distress” and “impact on sleep” showed convergent as well as divergent validity. The validity of the subscale “impact on daily reality perception” is unclear. If at all, this subscale is rather indirectly associated with nightmare distress. Furthermore, all of the NDQ items did not differentiate between a bad dream and a nightmare, which suggests that the NDQ might rather be a measure of negative dreams in general and not nightmares in particular. Based on the present experience sampling design, we propose to advance the validation process by further possibilities, such as an item-level, person-level, and multi-level approach. This approach seems to be especially fruitful for concepts which are not very salient (e.g., laughter), can hardly be remembered retrospectively (e.g., dream content), or are potentially threatened by recall biases (e.g., alcohol consumption).</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44412/3/Stieger_2-1r3y6ixiiehev6.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Stieger, Stefan</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 04.01.2019 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Stieger_2-1r3y6ixiiehev6.pdf 36

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto