Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können derzeit keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted currently.)

Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:5e33d06b16e341c92d0c2d4575200454

GAMP, Martina, Harald T. SCHUPP, Britta RENNER, 2018. Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback. In: Personality & social psychology bulletin. 44(9), pp. 1350-1363. ISSN 0146-1672. eISSN 1552-7433. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0146167218767877

@article{Gamp2018-09Perce-43098, title={Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback}, year={2018}, doi={10.1177/0146167218767877}, number={9}, volume={44}, issn={0146-1672}, journal={Personality & social psychology bulletin}, pages={1350--1363}, author={Gamp, Martina and Schupp, Harald T. and Renner, Britta} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Renner, Britta</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Renner, Britta</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Gamp, Martina</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Schupp, Harald T.</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2018-08-16T09:52:36Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Gamp, Martina</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2018-09</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Schupp, Harald T.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How do people respond to multiple risk feedback in a real-life context? Based on theoretical assumptions, three different predictions for risk perceptions were tested: (a) relative accuracy in risk perceptions, (b) self-defensive responses according to self-affirmation theory, and (c) compensatory responses according to the compensatory health belief model. Participants of a community health screening ( N = 725) received multiple risk indicator feedback for actual blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipid levels. Consistent multiple risk feedback profiles encompassed three consistent readings (three normal or three elevated readings). Mixed risk profiles included one elevated and two normal readings. Results indicate relative accuracy in responses: an elevated reading triggered higher risk perception of the respective risk factor. Importantly, the effect was not modulated by the presence of normal readings as assumed by the self-defensive or compensatory response perspective, indicating that people accurately integrate multiple risk indicator feedback as it is often provided in real life.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2018-08-16T09:52:36Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Aug 16, 2018 (Information about access statistics)

Gamp_2-qcf2ojm75nug5.pdf 436

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account