The limitations of fair division : an experimental evaluation of three procedures


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:5844b5e3653eab1dc32ad5f21c86c5ad

SCHNEIDER, Gerald, Ulrike Sabrina KRÄMER, 2004. The limitations of fair division : an experimental evaluation of three procedures. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution. 48(4), pp. 506-524. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0022002704266148

@article{Schneider2004limit-4228, title={The limitations of fair division : an experimental evaluation of three procedures}, year={2004}, doi={10.1177/0022002704266148}, number={4}, volume={48}, journal={Journal of Conflict Resolution}, pages={506--524}, author={Schneider, Gerald and Krämer, Ulrike Sabrina} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dcterms:issued>2004</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Mathematical procedures that promise an envy-free, equitable, and efficient solution to distributional conflicts have received widespread attention. Two fair-division mechanisms, adjusted Knaster and proportional Knaster, which are similar to the well-known adjusted-winner procedure, are compared with the less fair divide-and-choose mechanism. Results show that participants largely prefer the adjusted-Knaster procedure to the two alternatives. Adjusted Knaster, closely followed by proportional Knaster, also promises the highest average payoff. Yet the sophisticated mechanisms cease to perform better than divide-and-choose once actors receive the possibility to deviate from the mandatory bargaining protocols of fair-division procedures. The preference for adjusted and proportional Knaster is found to be a partial function of the participants psychological profile. The more antisocial a participant, the more likely this respondent is to opt for a procedure with a compensatory mechanism.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2011-03-24T10:13:09Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Krämer, Ulrike Sabrina</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Krämer, Ulrike Sabrina</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (2004), 4, pp. 506-524</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:title>The limitations of fair division : an experimental evaluation of three procedures</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2011-03-24T10:13:09Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 01.10.2014 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

The_limitation_of_fair_division_Kraemer_Schneider_JCR.pdf 671

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto