Journal article:
Mechanistic validation

No Thumbnail Available
Date
2013
Editors
relationships.isEditorOf
Contact
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
ArXiv-ID
International patent number
Link to the license
Project
EU project number
Open Access publication
Collections
Restricted until
Title in another language
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Abstract
Validation of new approaches in regulatory toxicology is commonly defined as the independent assessment of the reproducibility and relevance (the scientific basis and predictive capacity) of a test for a particular purpose. In large ring trials, the emphasis to date has been mainly on reproducibility and predictive capacity (comparison to the traditional test) with less attention given to the scientific or mechanistic basis. Assessing predictive capacity is difficult for novel approaches (which are based on mechanism), such as pathways of toxicity or the complex networks within the organism (systems toxicology). This is highly relevant for implementing Toxicology for the 21st Century, either by high-throughput testing in the ToxCast/Tox21 project or omics-based testing in the Human Toxome Project. This article explores the mostly neglected assessment of a test’s scientific basis, which moves mechanism and causality to the foreground when validating/qualifying tests. Such mechanistic validation faces the problem of establishing causality in complex systems. However, pragmatic adaptations of the Bradford Hill criteria, as well as bioinformatic tools, are emerging. As critical infrastructures of the organism are perturbed by a toxic mechanism we argue that by focusing on the target of toxicity and its vulnerability, in addition to the way it is perturbed, we can anchor the identification of the mechanism and its verification.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
570 Biosciences, Biology
Keywords
regulatory toxicology, Tox-21c, validation, alternatives to animal testing, systems biology
Published in
Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX ; 30 (2013), 2. - pp. 119-130. - ISSN 0946-7785. - eISSN 1868-8551
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690HARTUNG, Thomas, Sebastian HOFFMANN, Martin STEPHENS, 2013. Mechanistic validation. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 30(2), pp. 119-130. ISSN 0946-7785. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2013.2.119
BibTex
@article{Hartung2013Mecha-42187,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.14573/altex.2013.2.119},
  title={Mechanistic validation},
  number={2},
  volume={30},
  issn={0946-7785},
  journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX},
  pages={119--130},
  author={Hartung, Thomas and Hoffmann, Sebastian and Stephens, Martin}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42187">
    <dc:contributor>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Stephens, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Stephens, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42187"/>
    <dcterms:title>Mechanistic validation</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Validation of new approaches in regulatory toxicology is commonly defined as the independent assessment of the reproducibility and relevance (the scientific basis and predictive capacity) of a test for a particular purpose. In large ring trials, the emphasis to date has been mainly on reproducibility and predictive capacity (comparison to the traditional test) with less attention given to the scientific or mechanistic basis. Assessing predictive capacity is difficult for novel approaches (which are based on mechanism), such as pathways of toxicity or the complex networks within the organism (systems toxicology). This is highly relevant for implementing Toxicology for the 21st Century, either by high-throughput testing in the ToxCast/Tox21 project or omics-based testing in the Human Toxome Project. This article explores the mostly neglected assessment of a test’s scientific basis, which moves mechanism and causality to the foreground when validating/qualifying tests. Such mechanistic validation faces the problem of establishing causality in complex systems. However, pragmatic adaptations of the Bradford Hill criteria, as well as bioinformatic tools, are emerging. As critical infrastructures of the organism are perturbed by a toxic mechanism we argue that by focusing on the target of toxicity and its vulnerability, in addition to the way it is perturbed, we can anchor the identification of the mechanism and its verification.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42187/1/Hartung_2-1nfvsnnsgerej2.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42187/1/Hartung_2-1nfvsnnsgerej2.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-26T09:19:20Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-04-26T09:19:20Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Contact
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Link to research data
Description of supplementary data