Efficiency in Rule- vs. Plan-Based Movements Is Modulated by Action-Mode

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:f5695307af2c8f6f5c5c210f03e050a9

SCHEIB, Jean P.P., Sarah STOLL, J. Lukas THÜRMER, Jennifer RANDERATH, 2018. Efficiency in Rule- vs. Plan-Based Movements Is Modulated by Action-Mode. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 309. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00309

@article{Scheib2018-03-13Effic-41752, title={Efficiency in Rule- vs. Plan-Based Movements Is Modulated by Action-Mode}, year={2018}, doi={10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00309}, volume={9}, journal={Frontiers in Psychology}, author={Scheib, Jean P.P. and Stoll, Sarah and Thürmer, J. Lukas and Randerath, Jennifer}, note={Article Number: 309} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/41752"> <dcterms:issued>2018-03-13</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/page/termsofuse"/> <dc:creator>Stoll, Sarah</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41752"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41752/1/Scheib_2-npowbamq4uwn1.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Thürmer, J. Lukas</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-13T09:15:57Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Thürmer, J. Lukas</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Stoll, Sarah</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-13T09:15:57Z</dc:date> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41752/1/Scheib_2-npowbamq4uwn1.pdf"/> <dcterms:title>Efficiency in Rule- vs. Plan-Based Movements Is Modulated by Action-Mode</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Scheib, Jean P.P.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dc:creator>Scheib, Jean P.P.</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:creator>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The rule/plan motor cognition (RPMC) paradigm elicits visually indistinguishable motor outputs, resulting from either plan- or rule-based action-selection, using a combination of essentially interchangeable stimuli. Previous implementations of the RPMC paradigm have used pantomimed movements to compare plan- vs. rule-based action-selection. In the present work we attempt to determine the generalizability of previous RPMC findings to real object interaction by use of a grasp-to-rotate task. In the plan task, participants had to use prospective planning to achieve a comfortable post-handle rotation hand posture. The rule task used implementation intentions (if-then rules) leading to the same comfortable end-state. In Experiment A, we compare RPMC performance of 16 healthy participants in pantomime and real object conditions of the experiment, within-subjects. Higher processing efficiency of rule- vs. plan-based action-selection was supported by diffusion model analysis. Results show a significant response-time increase in the pantomime condition compared to the real object condition and a greater response-time advantage of rule-based vs. plan-based actions in the pantomime compared to the real object condition. In Experiment B, 24 healthy participants performed the real object RPMC task in a task switching vs. a blocked condition. Results indicate that plan-based action-selection leads to longer response-times and less efficient information processing than rule-based action-selection in line with previous RPMC findings derived from the pantomime action-mode. Particularly in the task switching mode, responses were faster in the rule compared to the plan task suggesting a modulating influence of cognitive load. Overall, results suggest an advantage of rule-based action-selection over plan-based action-selection; whereby differential mechanisms appear to be involved depending on the action-mode. We propose that cognitive load is a factor that modulates the advantageous effect of implementation intentions in motor cognition on different levels as illustrated by the varying speed advantages and the variation in diffusion parameters per action-mode or condition, respectively.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 13.03.2018 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Scheib_2-npowbamq4uwn1.pdf 28

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto