KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network

Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können am Montag, 6.2. und Dienstag, 7.2. keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted on Monday, Feb. 6 and Tuesday, Feb. 7.)

Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

BETSCH, Cornelia, Frank RENKEWITZ, Niels HAASE, 2013. Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network. In: Medical Decision Making. 33(1), pp. 14-25. ISSN 0272-989X. eISSN 1552-681X. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0272989X12452342

@article{Betsch2013Effec-41681, title={Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network}, year={2013}, doi={10.1177/0272989X12452342}, number={1}, volume={33}, issn={0272-989X}, journal={Medical Decision Making}, pages={14--25}, author={Betsch, Cornelia and Renkewitz, Frank and Haase, Niels} }

Renkewitz, Frank 2018-03-05T07:52:20Z Betsch, Cornelia eng 2013 2018-03-05T07:52:20Z Betsch, Cornelia Haase, Niels Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions : A simulation of an online patient social network Haase, Niels Renkewitz, Frank BACKGROUND: As the number of individuals who search for health information in interactive online environments is increasing, patient networks deserve more scientific attention.<br />OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively examine if and how reading statistical and/or narrative information as typically displayed in patient networks (e.g., patientslikeme.com) affects decisions for pharmaceuticals. Previous work suggests that narrative information (e.g., about vaccine adverse events, VAE) affects risk perceptions and intentions. The authors compare the effect of narrative and statistical information about VAE on vaccination decisions and examine if a disclaimer reduces the narrative bias as well as if low numeracy leads to increased use of the narratives.<br />METHOD AND DESIGN: In an online experiment, 458 participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (relative frequency of vaccine adverse events in 1, 7, or 17 of 20 cases) × 3 (type of information: narratives, summary statistics, or both) × 2 (bias awareness v. control disclaimer) between-subjects design. Measurements. Perceived risk, vaccination intention, and subjective numeracy.<br />RESULTS: A higher relative frequency of cases reporting VAE decreased the intention to get vaccinated. This relation was mediated by increased risk perception. The type of information moderated the contents' impact: Summary statistics had the smallest impact, whereas narrative information was more influential, and the presence of both types of information had the greatest impact on risk perception. Individuals who received the bias-awareness disclaimer were less influenced by the patient network. Highly numerate individuals were generally more sensitive to the provided information independent of its format.<br />CONCLUSIONS: Patient networks can influence vaccination decisions by delivering risk-related information. Disclaimers may help to reduce the influence if desired.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account