Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2018
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2018, 12(3), pp. 294-303. ISSN 1931-3896. eISSN 1931-390X. Available under: doi: 10.1037/aca0000139
Zusammenfassung
Recently, Kuchinke, Trapp, Jacobs, and Leder (2009) used pupillary peak dilations (PD) to test the hypothesis that fluent picture processing elicits aesthetic affects. They used reproductions of cubist pictures of different abstractness as stimuli, which was assumed to modulate processing fluency. As a result, less abstract pictures were not only processed more fluently and preferred, they also produced larger PDs than more abstract ones. This was interpreted as support of their hypothesis. The aim of the present study was to replicate and generalize these results with an improved method and by adding expressionist pictures, which covered a relatively large range of abstractness. In the first experiment, where art style was blocked, there were no clear results. Therefore, we randomized art style in the second experiment. This time PDs increased with decreasing abstractness, even though significantly only for the expressionist pictures. However, there was no relation between preference and PDs. Thus, although we also observed a covariation between abstractness and pupil size, our data do not support the idea that PDs reflect fluency-induced aesthetic affect.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
ELSCHNER, Sophie G., Ronald HÜBNER, Michael DAMBACHER, 2018. Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?. In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2018, 12(3), pp. 294-303. ISSN 1931-3896. eISSN 1931-390X. Available under: doi: 10.1037/aca0000139BibTex
@article{Elschner2018-08fluen-41483.2,
year={2018},
doi={10.1037/aca0000139},
title={Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?},
number={3},
volume={12},
issn={1931-3896},
journal={Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts},
pages={294--303},
author={Elschner, Sophie G. and Hübner, Ronald and Dambacher, Michael}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41483.2">
<dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41483.2"/>
<dc:contributor>Dambacher, Michael</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41483.2/1/Elschner_2-jqwatsqw451s6.pdf"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:title>Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?</dcterms:title>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41483.2/1/Elschner_2-jqwatsqw451s6.pdf"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-09-18T08:25:14Z</dcterms:available>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Dambacher, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Elschner, Sophie G.</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Elschner, Sophie G.</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-09-18T08:25:14Z</dc:date>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2018-08</dcterms:issued>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recently, Kuchinke, Trapp, Jacobs, and Leder (2009) used pupillary peak dilations (PD) to test the hypothesis that fluent picture processing elicits aesthetic affects. They used reproductions of cubist pictures of different abstractness as stimuli, which was assumed to modulate processing fluency. As a result, less abstract pictures were not only processed more fluently and preferred, they also produced larger PDs than more abstract ones. This was interpreted as support of their hypothesis. The aim of the present study was to replicate and generalize these results with an improved method and by adding expressionist pictures, which covered a relatively large range of abstractness. In the first experiment, where art style was blocked, there were no clear results. Therefore, we randomized art style in the second experiment. This time PDs increased with decreasing abstractness, even though significantly only for the expressionist pictures. However, there was no relation between preference and PDs. Thus, although we also observed a covariation between abstractness and pupil size, our data do not support the idea that PDs reflect fluency-induced aesthetic affect.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
