Financial Market Misconduct and Public Enforcement : The Case of Libor Manipulation
Financial Market Misconduct and Public Enforcement : The Case of Libor Manipulation
Date
2019
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Management Science ; 65 (2019), 11. - pp. 4951-5448. - ISSN 0025-1909. - eISSN 1526-5501
Abstract
Using comprehensive data on London Interbank Offer Rate (Libor) submissions from 2001 through 2012, we provide evidence consistent with banks manipulating Libor to profit from Libor-related positions and to signal their creditworthiness during distressed times. Evidence of manipulation is stronger for banks that were eventually sanctioned by regulators and disappears for all banks in the aftermath of the Libor investigations that began in 2010. Our findings suggest that the threat of large penalties and the loss of reputation that accompany public enforcement can be effective in deterring financial market misconduct.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
330 Economics
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
GANDHI, Priyank, Benjamin GOLEZ, Jens Carsten JACKWERTH, Alberto PLAZZI, 2019. Financial Market Misconduct and Public Enforcement : The Case of Libor Manipulation. In: Management Science. 65(11), pp. 4951-5448. ISSN 0025-1909. eISSN 1526-5501. Available under: doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3065BibTex
@article{Gandhi2019Finan-41356, year={2019}, doi={10.1287/mnsc.2018.3065}, title={Financial Market Misconduct and Public Enforcement : The Case of Libor Manipulation}, number={11}, volume={65}, issn={0025-1909}, journal={Management Science}, pages={4951--5448}, author={Gandhi, Priyank and Golez, Benjamin and Jackwerth, Jens Carsten and Plazzi, Alberto} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41356"> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41356/1/Financial%20Market%20Misconduct%20and%20Public%20Enforcement_The%20Case%20of%20Libor%20Manipulation%20with%20Appendix.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-14T13:54:26Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Jackwerth, Jens Carsten</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-14T13:54:26Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Gandhi, Priyank</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41356"/> <dc:contributor>Jackwerth, Jens Carsten</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:contributor>Plazzi, Alberto</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Golez, Benjamin</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:contributor>Gandhi, Priyank</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Plazzi, Alberto</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Using comprehensive data on London Interbank Offer Rate (Libor) submissions from 2001 through 2012, we provide evidence consistent with banks manipulating Libor to profit from Libor-related positions and to signal their creditworthiness during distressed times. Evidence of manipulation is stronger for banks that were eventually sanctioned by regulators and disappears for all banks in the aftermath of the Libor investigations that began in 2010. Our findings suggest that the threat of large penalties and the loss of reputation that accompany public enforcement can be effective in deterring financial market misconduct.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Financial Market Misconduct and Public Enforcement : The Case of Libor Manipulation</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Golez, Benjamin</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41356/1/Financial%20Market%20Misconduct%20and%20Public%20Enforcement_The%20Case%20of%20Libor%20Manipulation%20with%20Appendix.pdf"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Yes