KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”

Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

SKOVGAARD-OLSEN, Niels, David KELLEN, Hannes KRAHL, Karl Christoph KLAUER, 2017. Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”. In: Thinking & Reasoning. 23(4), pp. 449-482. ISSN 1354-6783. eISSN 1464-0708. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13546783.2017.1374306

@article{SkovgaardOlsen2017Relev-40920, title={Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”}, year={2017}, doi={10.1080/13546783.2017.1374306}, number={4}, volume={23}, issn={1354-6783}, journal={Thinking & Reasoning}, pages={449--482}, author={Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels and Kellen, David and Krahl, Hannes and Klauer, Karl Christoph} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40920"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-12-13T11:14:40Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-12-13T11:14:40Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Krahl, Hannes</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Kellen, David</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Klauer, Karl Christoph</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40920"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this study, we investigate the influence of reason-relation readings of indicative conditionals and “and”/“but”/“therefore” sentences on various cognitive assessments. According to the Frege–Grice tradition, a dissociation is expected. Specifically, differences in the reason-relation reading of these sentences should affect participants’ evaluations of their acceptability but not of their truth value. In two experiments we tested this assumption by introducing a relevance manipulation into the truth-table task as well as in other tasks assessing the participants’ acceptability and probability evaluations. Across the two experiments, a strong dissociation was found. The reason-relation reading of all four sentences strongly affected their probability and acceptability evaluations, but hardly affected their respective truth evaluations. Implications of this result for recent work on indicative conditionals are discussed.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Krahl, Hannes</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Klauer, Karl Christoph</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:contributor>Kellen, David</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto