Type of Publication: | Journal article |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-55878 |
Author: | Schneider, Gerald |
Year of publication: | 2008 |
Published in: | European Political Science ; 7 (2008), 2. - pp. 199-206 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210189 |
Summary: |
This article takes issue with Steiner's polemic against the usage of deliberation in rational choice scholarship. I show i) that the reproach that rationalists do not allow for preference change is mistaken; ii) that Steiner does not sufficiently distinguish between normative and positive contributions and iii) that he shields his preferred model against systematic comparisons with strategic models of deliberation. In my view, we need more competing model evaluations rather than misleading attacks against imagined heretics.
|
Subject (DDC): | 320 Politics |
Controlled Keywords (GND): | Rational Choice |
Keywords: | Deliberation, Geschworenentheorem, Kollektive Entscheidungsfindung, Wissenschaftstheorie, Deliberation, Condorcet Jury Theorem, Social Choice, Rational Choice, Theory of Science |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
SCHNEIDER, Gerald, 2008. De deliberatibus disputandum est: a response to Jürg Steiner. In: European Political Science. 7(2), pp. 199-206. Available under: doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210189
@article{Schneider2008delib-3943, title={De deliberatibus disputandum est: a response to Jürg Steiner}, year={2008}, doi={10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210189}, number={2}, volume={7}, journal={European Political Science}, pages={199--206}, author={Schneider, Gerald} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/3943"> <dcterms:title>De deliberatibus disputandum est: a response to Jürg Steiner</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3943/1/eps_responsetojuergsteiner.pdf"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:44Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3943/1/eps_responsetojuergsteiner.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article takes issue with Steiner's polemic against the usage of deliberation in rational choice scholarship. I show i) that the reproach that rationalists do not allow for preference change is mistaken; ii) that Steiner does not sufficiently distinguish between normative and positive contributions and iii) that he shields his preferred model against systematic comparisons with strategic models of deliberation. In my view, we need more competing model evaluations rather than misleading attacks against imagined heretics.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: European Political Science 7 (2008), 2, pp. 199-206</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:44Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3943"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
eps_responsetojuergsteiner.pdf | 702 |