De deliberatibus disputandum est: a response to Jürg Steiner

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:f87e0615850bc2c2d571b6ff221a98e2

SCHNEIDER, Gerald, 2008. De deliberatibus disputandum est: a response to Jürg Steiner. In: European Political Science. 7(2), pp. 199-206. Available under: doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210189

@article{Schneider2008delib-3943, title={De deliberatibus disputandum est: a response to Jürg Steiner}, year={2008}, doi={10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210189}, number={2}, volume={7}, journal={European Political Science}, pages={199--206}, author={Schneider, Gerald} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/3943"> <dcterms:title>De deliberatibus disputandum est: a response to Jürg Steiner</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3943/1/eps_responsetojuergsteiner.pdf"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:44Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3943/1/eps_responsetojuergsteiner.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article takes issue with Steiner's polemic against the usage of deliberation in rational choice scholarship. I show i) that the reproach that rationalists do not allow for preference change is mistaken; ii) that Steiner does not sufficiently distinguish between normative and positive contributions and iii) that he shields his preferred model against systematic comparisons with strategic models of deliberation. In my view, we need more competing model evaluations rather than misleading attacks against imagined heretics.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: European Political Science 7 (2008), 2, pp. 199-206</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:44Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3943"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Oct 1, 2014 (Information about access statistics)

eps_responsetojuergsteiner.pdf 553

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account