Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

WALKDEN, George, 2010. Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change. CAMling 2010 : Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge, Dec 7, 2010 - Dec 8, 2010. In: CUMMINS, Chris, ed., Chi-Hé ELDER, ed., Thomas GODARD, ed., Morgan MACLEOD, ed., Elaine SCHMIDT, ed., George WALKDEN, ed.. CAMling 2010 : Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge:Cambridge Institute of Language Research (CILR), pp. 230-239

@inproceedings{Walkden2010Abduc-38994, title={Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change}, url={http://www.srcf.ucam.org/camling/proceedings/walkden.pdf}, year={2010}, address={Cambridge}, publisher={Cambridge Institute of Language Research (CILR)}, booktitle={CAMling 2010 : Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research}, pages={230--239}, editor={Cummins, Chris and Elder, Chi-Hé and Godard, Thomas and Macleod, Morgan and Schmidt, Elaine and Walkden, George}, author={Walkden, George} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/38994"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-22T11:19:08Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Two assumptions often considered principles of inquiry in historical generative syntax are that linguistic change is abductive (Andersen 1973) and that syntax is inert (Longobardi 2001). In this paper it is demonstrated that these two notions, if meaningfully interpreted, are not compatible: if we wish to develop a coherent theory of language acquisition and change, we must abandon one or the other. The conclusion reached is that that neither abduction nor inertia is a necessary or useful concept in diachronic syntax. I suggest that we should abandon both, instead treating syntactic change on its own terms.</dcterms:abstract> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38994"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-22T11:19:08Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Walkden, George</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Walkden, George</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account