Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions
| Restricted until: | May 31, 2019 |
| Type of Publication: | Journal article |
| Publication status: | Published |
| URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2--fymwb7hdsr2t7 |
| Author: | Dörfler, Thomas; Holzinger, Katharina; Biesenbender, Jan |
| Year of publication: | 2017 |
| Published in: | International Journal of Public Administration ; 40 (2017), 14. - pp. 1237-1249. - ISSN 0190-0692. - eISSN 1532-4265 |
| DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1295267 |
| Summary: |
Despite high institutional hurdles for constitutional change, one observes surprisingly many EU treaty revisions. This article takes up the questions of what determines whether a treaty provision is successfully changed and why provisions are renegotiated at subsequent Intergovernmental Conferences. The article presents an institutionalist theory explaining success and renegotiation and tests the theory using all core institutional provisions by means of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The causal analysis shows that low conflict potential of an issue is sufficient for successfully changing the treaties. Furthermore, high conflict potential of an issue and its fundamental change are sufficient for it to be renegotiated.
|
| Subject (DDC): | 320 Politics |
| Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Cite This
Files in this item
![[PDF]](/themes/Kops/images/mimes/pdf.png "PDF file"){kind=small}
DÖRFLER, Thomas, Katharina HOLZINGER, Jan BIESENBENDER, 2017. Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions. In: International Journal of Public Administration. 40(14), pp. 1237-1249. ISSN 0190-0692. eISSN 1532-4265. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1295267
@article{Dorfler2017-03-28Const-38889, title={Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions}, year={2017}, doi={10.1080/01900692.2017.1295267}, number={14}, volume={40}, issn={0190-0692}, journal={International Journal of Public Administration}, pages={1237--1249}, author={Dörfler, Thomas and Holzinger, Katharina and Biesenbender, Jan} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/38889"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Dörfler, Thomas</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Holzinger, Katharina</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2017-03-28</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-15T09:45:03Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Constitutional Dynamics in the European Union : Success, Failure, and Stability of Institutional Treaty Revisions</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-15T09:45:03Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Biesenbender, Jan</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Biesenbender, Jan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Dörfler, Thomas</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Holzinger, Katharina</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38889"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Despite high institutional hurdles for constitutional change, one observes surprisingly many EU treaty revisions. This article takes up the questions of what determines whether a treaty provision is successfully changed and why provisions are renegotiated at subsequent Intergovernmental Conferences. The article presents an institutionalist theory explaining success and renegotiation and tests the theory using all core institutional provisions by means of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The causal analysis shows that low conflict potential of an issue is sufficient for successfully changing the treaties. Furthermore, high conflict potential of an issue and its fundamental change are sufficient for it to be renegotiated.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Search KOPS
Browse
My Account
