KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Evaluating Scripting Languages : How Python Can Help Political Methodologists

Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)

Evaluating Scripting Languages : How Python Can Help Political Methodologists

Type of Publication: Journal article
URI (citable link): http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-76526
Author: Döring, Holger
Year of publication: 2008
Published in: The Political Methodologist ; 16 (2008), 1. - pp. 8-12
Summary:
Why Python?
Political methodologists tend to make passionate statements about their software tools. The PolMeth mailing list frequently gives strong advocacy for the use of Linux, LATEX, Emacs and other specific programmes. For statistical analysis R has become the mainstream programming language. However, frequent encouragements to use PHP for web purposes or Perl for various scripting tasks highlight the need for a major scripting language beside R. Once political scientists need systematic parsing of markup languages or have to generate web presentations from their data, R quickly reaches its limits. For me, Python has become my favourite scripting language of choice. Having had some previous exposure to C, Java, PHP and Perl, Python turned out to meet all my needs for software development, that R can not fulfil. So let me introduce you to the beauty of Python.
Subject (DDC): 350 Public Administration
Link to License: In Copyright

Cite This

Files in this item

[PDF]
Name: doering_2008.pdf
Size: 234.9 KiB
Format: PDF
View/Open
Checksum: MD5:de5d5aa56fe21d626c901ddae5d92562

DÖRING, Holger, 2008. Evaluating Scripting Languages : How Python Can Help Political Methodologists. In: The Political Methodologist. 16(1), pp. 8-12

@article{Doring2008Evalu-3880, title={Evaluating Scripting Languages : How Python Can Help Political Methodologists}, year={2008}, number={1}, volume={16}, journal={The Political Methodologist}, pages={8--12}, author={Döring, Holger} }

eng Döring, Holger application/pdf 2011-03-24T10:09:28Z Döring, Holger First publ. in: The Political Methodologist 16 (2008), 1, pp. 8-12 2011-03-24T10:09:28Z Why Python?<br />Political methodologists tend to make passionate statements about their software tools. The PolMeth mailing list frequently gives strong advocacy for the use of Linux, LATEX, Emacs and other specific programmes. For statistical analysis R has become the mainstream programming language. However, frequent encouragements to use PHP for web purposes or Perl for various scripting tasks highlight the need for a major scripting language beside R. Once political scientists need systematic parsing of markup languages or have to generate web presentations from their data, R quickly reaches its limits. For me, Python has become my favourite scripting language of choice. Having had some previous exposure to C, Java, PHP and Perl, Python turned out to meet all my needs for software development, that R can not fulfil. So let me introduce you to the beauty of Python. Evaluating Scripting Languages : How Python Can Help Political Methodologists terms-of-use 2008

Downloads since Oct 1, 2014 (Information about access statistics)

doering_2008.pdf 1048

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account