Making Rules for Governing Global Commons

Thumbnail Image
Date
2000
Authors
Bräuninger, Thomas
König, Thomas
Editors
Contact
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
ArXiv-ID
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Restricted until
Title in another language
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published in
Journal of Conflict Resolution ; 44 (2000), 5. - pp. 604-629
Abstract
Acentral goal of the Third United Nations Conference on the Lawof the Sea 1973-1982was to establish an international order for the use of the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction. An overwhelming majority of countries signed the comprehensive convention, but several countries including the industrialized G7 members Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the formerWest Germany rejected the new ocean regime in 1982. This article addresses the question of why some states opposed the 1982 convention by examining their preferences for alternative decision-making rules. A policy-seeking approach is used by deriving the preferences of 149 states for different decision-making rules from three components: states preferences for policies, the working properties of different decision-making rules, and the location of the status quo. Findings showwhy the 1982 proposal failed to be supported by the main industrialized countries. Some evidence exists for the successful foundation of a multicameral rule in 1994.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
320 Politics
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690BRÄUNINGER, Thomas, Thomas KÖNIG, 2000. Making Rules for Governing Global Commons. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution. 44(5), pp. 604-629. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0022002700044005003
BibTex
@article{Brauninger2000Makin-3865,
  year={2000},
  doi={10.1177/0022002700044005003},
  title={Making Rules for Governing Global Commons},
  number={5},
  volume={44},
  journal={Journal of Conflict Resolution},
  pages={604--629},
  author={Bräuninger, Thomas and König, Thomas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3865">
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Bräuninger, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:25Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3865"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Acentral goal of the Third United Nations Conference on the Lawof the Sea 1973-1982was to establish an international order for the use of the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction. An overwhelming majority of countries signed the comprehensive convention, but several countries including the industrialized G7 members Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the formerWest Germany rejected the new ocean regime in 1982. This article addresses the question of why some states opposed the 1982 convention by examining their preferences for alternative decision-making rules. A policy-seeking approach is used by deriving the preferences of 149 states for different decision-making rules from three components: states  preferences for policies, the working properties of different decision-making rules, and the location of the status quo. Findings showwhy the 1982 proposal failed to be supported by the main industrialized countries. Some evidence exists for the successful foundation of a multicameral rule in 1994.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3865/1/Making_rules.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:25Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Making Rules for Governing Global Commons</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>König, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3865/1/Making_rules.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>König, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2000</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (2000),  5, pp. 604-629</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:creator>Bräuninger, Thomas</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Contact
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Refereed