KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children : assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation

Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children : assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

SCHOEMAKER, Dorothee, Claudia BUSS, Kevin HEAD, Curt A. SANDMAN, Elysia P. DAVIS, M. Mallar CHAKRAVARTY, Serge GAUTHIER, Jens C. PRUESSNER, 2016. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children : assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation. In: NeuroImage. 129, pp. 1-14. ISSN 1053-8119. eISSN 1095-9572. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.038

@article{Schoemaker2016-04Hippo-38172, title={Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children : assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation}, year={2016}, doi={10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.038}, volume={129}, issn={1053-8119}, journal={NeuroImage}, pages={1--14}, author={Schoemaker, Dorothee and Buss, Claudia and Head, Kevin and Sandman, Curt A. and Davis, Elysia P. and Chakravarty, M. Mallar and Gauthier, Serge and Pruessner, Jens C.} }

Schoemaker, Dorothee 2017-03-28T12:43:47Z 2016-04 Buss, Claudia Davis, Elysia P. Head, Kevin Davis, Elysia P. Sandman, Curt A. Buss, Claudia The volumetric quantification of brain structures is of great interest in pediatric populations because it allows the investigation of different factors influencing neurodevelopment. FreeSurfer and FSL both provide frequently used packages for automatic segmentation of brain structures. In this study, we examined the accuracy and consistency of those two automated protocols relative to manual segmentation, commonly considered as the "gold standard" technique, for estimating hippocampus and amygdala volumes in a sample of preadolescent children aged between 6 to 11 years. The volumes obtained with FreeSurfer and FSL-FIRST were evaluated and compared with manual segmentations with respect to volume difference, spatial agreement and between- and within-method correlations.<br /><br />Results highlighted a tendency for both automated techniques to overestimate hippocampus and amygdala volumes, in comparison to manual segmentation. This was more pronounced when using FreeSurfer than FSL-FIRST and, for both techniques, the overestimation was more marked for the amygdala than the hippocampus. Pearson correlations support moderate associations between manual tracing and FreeSurfer for hippocampus (right r=0.69, p<0.001; left r=0.77, p<0.001) and amygdala (right r=0.61, p<0.001; left r=0.67, p<0.001) volumes. Correlation coefficients between manual segmentation and FSL-FIRST were statistically significant (right hippocampus r=0.59, p<0.001; left hippocampus r=0.51, p<0.001; right amygdala r=0.35, p<0.001; left amygdala r=0.31, p<0.001) but were significantly weaker, for all investigated structures. When computing intraclass correlation coefficients between manual tracing and automatic segmentation, all comparisons, except for left hippocampus volume estimated with FreeSurfer, failed to reach 0.70. When looking at each method separately, correlations between left and right hemispheric volumes showed strong associations between bilateral hippocampus and bilateral amygdala volumes when assessed using manual segmentation or FreeSurfer. These correlations were significantly weaker when volumes were assessed with FSL-FIRST. Finally, Bland-Altman plots suggest that the difference between manual and automatic segmentation might be influenced by the volume of the structure, because smaller volumes were associated with larger volume differences between techniques.<br /><br />These results demonstrate that, at least in a pediatric population, the agreement between amygdala and hippocampus volumes obtained with automated FSL-FIRST and FreeSurfer protocols and those obtained with manual segmentation is not strong. Visual inspection by an informed individual and, if necessary, manual correction of automated segmentation outputs are important to ensure validity of volumetric results and interpretation of related findings. Pruessner, Jens C. 2017-03-28T12:43:47Z Sandman, Curt A. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children : assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation Pruessner, Jens C. Schoemaker, Dorothee Gauthier, Serge Chakravarty, M. Mallar eng Gauthier, Serge Head, Kevin Chakravarty, M. Mallar

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto