Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)

Gender on definite pronouns

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:76eb5f5a814f4463a3505542bb0b9835

GIURGEA, Ion, 2008. Gender on definite pronouns

@techreport{Giurgea2008Gende-3727, series={Bucharest Working papers in Linguistics;10}, title={Gender on definite pronouns}, year={2008}, author={Giurgea, Ion} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper explores some issues related to the interpretation of gender on definite pronouns. Gender in definite pronouns (i.e. personal and demonstrative pronouns) may either reflect the gender of the noun of the antecedent (grammatical gender) or a property of the referent (natural gender). We can note, across languages, that natural gender may override grammatical gender for persons but not for inanimates. I explain this by assuming that neuter natural gender means lack of descriptive content, the inanimate interpretation arising from an implicature, and that a general principle requires pronouns to bear a descriptive specification whenever possible (this specification can be represented either by nominal anaphora or by the descriptive content of natural gender). It follows that neuter natural gender is only used for entities which do not fall under a nominal concept (propositional objects, denoted by clauses, and uncategorized perceptual objects). In languages with the two-fold opposition masculine/feminine, special pronouns lacking grammatical gender (the so-called call neuter pronouns ) are used for entities which do not fall under a nominal concept. Romanian patterns with these languages, which supports the idea that Romanian does not have a three-gender system, but a two-gender one. Having established that in Romanian the category of Gender does not have more than two values, I discuss several possible analyses of the so-called neuter nouns in this language, concluding that genders must be distinguished from nominal agreement classes, as proposed by Corbett (1991). Romanian can be described as having two genders and three nominal classes. A minimalist formalization of this distinction is put forth, which is based on Ritter s (1993) proposal that Gender is generated on Num in Romance languages.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Gender on definite pronouns</dcterms:title> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Giurgea, Ion</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2011-03-24T10:06:18Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Giurgea, Ion</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2011-03-24T10:06:18Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Oct 1, 2014 (Information about access statistics)

Gender_on_Definite_Pronouns.pdf 497

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account