Type of Publication: | Journal article |
Publication status: | Published |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-365945 |
Author: | Stieger, Stefan; Reips, Ulf-Dietrich |
Year of publication: | 2016 |
Published in: | PeerJ ; 4 (2016). - e2395. - eISSN 2167-8359 |
Pubmed ID: | 27651989 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2395 |
Summary: |
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is a frequently used measure of cognitive vs. intuitive reflection. It is also a frequently found entertaining 'test' on the Internet. In a large age-stratified community-based sample (N = 2,272), we analyzed the impact of having already performed the CRT or any similar task in the past. Indeed, we found that 44% of participants had experiences with these tasks, which was reflected in higher CRT scores (Cohen's d = 0.41). Furthermore, experienced participants were different from naïve participants in regard to their socio-demographics (younger, higher educated, fewer siblings, more likely single or in a relationship than married, having no children). The best predictors of a high CRT score were the highest educational qualification (4.62% explained variance) followed by the experience with the task (3.06%). Therefore, we suggest using more recent multi-item CRTs with newer items and a more elaborated test construction.
|
Subject (DDC): | 150 Psychology |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
STIEGER, Stefan, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, 2016. A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test : familiarity. In: PeerJ. 4, e2395. eISSN 2167-8359. Available under: doi: 10.7717/peerj.2395
@article{Stieger2016limit-37091, title={A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test : familiarity}, year={2016}, doi={10.7717/peerj.2395}, volume={4}, journal={PeerJ}, author={Stieger, Stefan and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich}, note={Article Number: e2395} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/37091"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37091/5/Stieger_0-365945.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is a frequently used measure of cognitive vs. intuitive reflection. It is also a frequently found entertaining 'test' on the Internet. In a large age-stratified community-based sample (N = 2,272), we analyzed the impact of having already performed the CRT or any similar task in the past. Indeed, we found that 44% of participants had experiences with these tasks, which was reflected in higher CRT scores (Cohen's d = 0.41). Furthermore, experienced participants were different from naïve participants in regard to their socio-demographics (younger, higher educated, fewer siblings, more likely single or in a relationship than married, having no children). The best predictors of a high CRT score were the highest educational qualification (4.62% explained variance) followed by the experience with the task (3.06%). Therefore, we suggest using more recent multi-item CRTs with newer items and a more elaborated test construction.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test : familiarity</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Stieger, Stefan</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37091/5/Stieger_0-365945.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/37091"/> <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Stieger, Stefan</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-03T10:51:29Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-03T10:51:29Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Stieger_0-365945.pdf | 265 |