Decision versus compromise for animal groups in motion

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:92ddf08ba0d188f24624a56cceec1686

LEONARD, Naomi E., Tian SHEN, Benjamin NABET, Luca SCARDOVI, Iain D. COUZIN, Simon A. LEVIN, 2012. Decision versus compromise for animal groups in motion. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(1), pp. 227-232. ISSN 0027-8424. eISSN 1091-6490. Available under: doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118318108

@article{Leonard2012Decis-37081, title={Decision versus compromise for animal groups in motion}, year={2012}, doi={10.1073/pnas.1118318108}, number={1}, volume={109}, issn={0027-8424}, journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, pages={227--232}, author={Leonard, Naomi E. and Shen, Tian and Nabet, Benjamin and Scardovi, Luca and Couzin, Iain D. and Levin, Simon A.} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dc:creator>Leonard, Naomi E.</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Leonard, Naomi E.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Couzin, Iain D.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Scardovi, Luca</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2017-02-03T08:36:20Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:creator>Levin, Simon A.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Shen, Tian</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Previously, we showed using a computational agent-based model that a group of animals moving together can make a collective decision on direction of motion, even if there is a conflict between the directional preferences of two small subgroups of "informed" individuals and the remaining "uninformed" individuals have no directional preference. The model requires no explicit signaling or identification of informed individuals; individuals merely adjust their steering in response to socially acquired information on relative motion of neighbors. In this paper, we show how the dynamics of this system can be modeled analytically, and we derive a testable result that adding uninformed individuals improves stability of collective decision making. We first present a continuous-time dynamic model and prove a necessary and sufficient condition for stable convergence to a collective decision in this model. The stability of the decision, which corresponds to most of the group moving in one of two alternative preferred directions, depends explicitly on the magnitude of the difference in preferred directions; for a difference above a threshold the decision is stable and below that same threshold the decision is unstable. Given qualitative agreement with the results of the previous simulation study, we proceed to explore analytically the subtle but important role of the uninformed individuals in the continuous-time model. Significantly, we show that the likelihood of a collective decision increases with increasing numbers of uninformed individuals.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Nabet, Benjamin</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>Decision versus compromise for animal groups in motion</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Couzin, Iain D.</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Nabet, Benjamin</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Shen, Tian</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Scardovi, Luca</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2017-02-03T08:36:20Z</dc:date> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Levin, Simon A.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Feb 3, 2017 (Information about access statistics)

Leonard_0-387683.pdf 196

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account