KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not

Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

BRANDES, Ulrik, 2011. Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not. 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). Hong Kong, China, 1. Mär 2011 - 4. Mär 2011. In: 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis 2011) : Hong Kong, China, 1 - 4 March 2011. 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). Hong Kong, China, 1. Mär 2011 - 4. Mär 2011. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE, pp. xii. ISBN 978-1-61284-935-5. Available under: doi: 10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366

@inproceedings{Brandes2011-03Keyno-36931, title={Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not}, year={2011}, doi={10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366}, isbn={978-1-61284-935-5}, address={Piscataway, NJ}, publisher={IEEE}, booktitle={2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis 2011) : Hong Kong, China, 1 - 4 March 2011}, author={Brandes, Ulrik} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36931"> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The main algorithmic challenge in network visualization is the placement of nodes. While plenty of layout algorithms have been proposed, the vast majority of information visualization tools appears to utilize (sometimes a variant of) one of two algorithms: the approach of Fruchterman and Reingold or that of Kamada and Kawai. Both are often referred to as force-directed methods, or spring embedders, and praised for their general applicability, high adaptability, and simplicity. I will argue that commonly used implementations and even the approaches themselves are outdated and, in fact, have always been. They should be replaced by variants of multidimensional scaling that display superior results and scalability, and are just as flexible and easy to implement. Some of these statements may actually be backed by evidence.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Brandes, Ulrik</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-24T14:06:16Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2011-03</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36931"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-24T14:06:16Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Brandes, Ulrik</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto