KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Responsiveness - To Whom? : Why the Primacy of the Median Voter Alienates Minorities

Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)

Responsiveness - To Whom? : Why the Primacy of the Median Voter Alienates Minorities

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

HÄNNI, Miriam, 2017. Responsiveness - To Whom? : Why the Primacy of the Median Voter Alienates Minorities. In: Political Studies. 65(3), pp. 665-684. ISSN 0032-3217. eISSN 1467-9248. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0032321716680376

@article{Hanni2017Respo-36413.2, title={Responsiveness - To Whom? : Why the Primacy of the Median Voter Alienates Minorities}, year={2017}, doi={10.1177/0032321716680376}, number={3}, volume={65}, issn={0032-3217}, journal={Political Studies}, pages={665--684}, author={Hänni, Miriam} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36413.2"> <dcterms:title>Responsiveness - To Whom? : Why the Primacy of the Median Voter Alienates Minorities</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Many see responsiveness towards the majority as sufficient for democracy because no other policy position receives more support. By contrast, I argue that the primacy of the majority is normatively and empirically problematic. From a normative point of view a ‘good’ democracy does not only need to maximise the influence of the majority but must also protect minorities against oppression by the majority population. These two goals are difficult to reconcile when majorities and minorities have different policy preferences. From an empirical point of view, a lack of policy responsiveness towards minorities has real empirical consequences as it may endanger the legitimacy and stability of a democracy by decreasing the political support of minority groups. The empirical analyses with 28 minority groups confirm the risks of a lack of policy responsiveness: minorities exhibit less political support than majorities, partly because responsiveness towards them is lower.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Hänni, Miriam</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-01-22T10:00:58Z</dc:date> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Hänni, Miriam</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36413.2"/> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-01-22T10:00:58Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Version History

Version Item Date Summary Publication Version

*Selected version

Search KOPS


My Account