Ranking Functions, AGM Style

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:65b8411ce8430f92f43993fbc31b8adc

SPOHN, Wolfgang, 1999. Ranking Functions, AGM Style. In: HANSSON, B., ed. and others. Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors. Lund

@incollection{Spohn1999Ranki-3537, title={Ranking Functions, AGM Style}, year={1999}, address={Lund}, booktitle={Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors}, editor={Hansson, B.}, author={Spohn, Wolfgang} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/3537"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors / B. Hansson ... (eds.). - Lund, 1999</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:title>Ranking Functions, AGM Style</dcterms:title> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3537/1/Ranking_Functions.pdf"/> <dcterms:issued>1999</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">The paper first points out that ranking functions are superior to AGM belief revision theory in two crucial respects, i.e. in solving the problem of iterated belief revision and in giving an adequate account of doxastic independence (this was indeed why ranking function were developed in No. 15). Second, it shows how ranking functions are uniquely reflected in iterated belief change. More precisely, it specifies conditions on threefold contractions which suffice to represent contractions by a ranking function uniquely up to multiplication by a positive integer (a result independently obtained by Matthias Hild). Thus, an important advantage AGM theory was always claimed to have over ranking functions proves to be spurious.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:40Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3537/1/Ranking_Functions.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3537"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/legalcode"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:40Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Oct 1, 2014 (Information about access statistics)

Ranking_Functions.pdf 118

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

terms-of-use Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as terms-of-use

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account