Conflict of interest Statements : current dilemma and a possible way forward


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:d6b7a92ab341cd014f59d80d7711b0b9

DIETRICH, Daniel R., Jan G. HENGSTLER, 2016. Conflict of interest Statements : current dilemma and a possible way forward. In: Archives of Toxicology. 90(9), pp. 2293-2295. ISSN 0003-9446. eISSN 1432-0738. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1783-y

@article{Dietrich2016-09Confl-34861, title={Conflict of interest Statements : current dilemma and a possible way forward}, year={2016}, doi={10.1007/s00204-016-1783-y}, number={9}, volume={90}, issn={0003-9446}, journal={Archives of Toxicology}, pages={2293--2295}, author={Dietrich, Daniel R. and Hengstler, Jan G.} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2016-07-25T13:51:34Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2016-09</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Hengstler, Jan G.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2016-07-25T13:51:34Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Conflict of interest Statements : current dilemma and a possible way forward</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A definition of the term ‘conflict of interest’ was suggested by Dennis Thompson in (1993) and can still be considered valid: ‘A conflict of interest is a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgement or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest’ (Thompson 1993). Today, the ‘circumstances’ from Thompson’s definition have been restricted almost exclusively to funding or payment from industry. This form of a potential conflict of interest (CoI) is currently handled quite rigorously. For example, in the USA, industry-funded scientists are usually excluded from governmental advisory bodies. This reflects a development which took place during the past 20 years. Back in 2002, there was still an open debate as to whether industry-funded scientists should be included into governmental expert commissions and whether ‘one should look at the data and not who generated the data’ (SOT 2002). While it is beyond dispute that industry employment or funding could potentially represent a CoI, it is just as critical that other circumstances that also could create a secondary interest are taken equally into account.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Dietrich, Daniel R.</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Dietrich, Daniel R.</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Hengstler, Jan G.</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 25.07.2016 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Dietrich_2-5a637jkubdyu1.pdf 7

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto