A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:c433c2ebc36ede2f02f529c4a66e774f

SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2002. A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions. In: Synthese. 131, pp. 39-56

@article{Spohn2002Brief-3477, title={A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions}, year={2002}, doi={10.1023/A:1015004212541}, volume={131}, journal={Synthese}, pages={39--56}, author={Spohn, Wolfgang} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/3477"> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3477"/> <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:rights>deposit-license</dc:rights> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:29Z</dc:date> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Synthese 131 (2002), pp. 39-56</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:title>A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">For more than 20 years John Pollock is elaborating a detailed account of defeasible reasoning. Ranking theory as developed by me in Spohn (1988) "Ordinal Conditional Functions. A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States" (but see also Spohn (2001) "Deterministic Causation") offers such an account, too. The paper first gives a very brief informal sketch of the two accounts. It then explains that the basic difference is that Pollock's theory is entirely computational, whereas mine is located at a regulative level. It continues to argue that Pollock's theory cannot bridge this difference and that its normative condition is therefore deficient. The final section shows, by contrast, that ranking theory provides ample means to bridge the difference.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/legalcode"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:29Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 01.10.2014 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

A_Brief_Comparison_of_Pollocks_Defeasible_Reasoning_and_Ranking_Functions.pdf 116

Das Dokument erscheint in:

deposit-license Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: deposit-license

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto