Vier Begründungsbegriffe

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:8574a5d75663778ad66fbf1ebe16cca7

SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2001. Vier Begründungsbegriffe. In: GRUNDMANN, T., ed.. Challenges to Traditional Epistemology. Paderborn:Mentis-Verl., pp. 33-52

@incollection{Spohn2001Begru-3461, title={Vier Begründungsbegriffe}, year={2001}, address={Paderborn}, publisher={Mentis-Verl.}, booktitle={Challenges to Traditional Epistemology}, pages={33--52}, editor={Grundmann, T.}, author={Spohn, Wolfgang} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/3461"> <dc:rights>deposit-license</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The paper distinguishes four basic notions of one assumption or proposition being a reason for (or justifying) another: a deductive notion, a computational notion, a causal notion, and a positive relevance notion (as first defended by me in Spohn (1983) "Deterministic and Probabilistic Reasons and Causes"). After setting these notions within three important distinctions of present-day epistemology - knowledge vs. belief, internalistic vs. externalistic, and normative vs. naturalized epistemology - and after explaining why I tend to be a normative internalist belief theorist, I compare the four notions and argue that the positive relevance notion is the most adequate and fruitful one.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Vier Begründungsbegriffe</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:26Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/legalcode"/> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3461"/> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:26Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Zuerst ersch. in: Challenges to Traditional Epistemology / T. Grundmann (ed.). - Paderborn: Mentis-Verl., 2001, S. 33-52</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:issued>2001</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 01.10.2014 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Spohn_2001_Vier_Begruendungsbegriffe.pdf 86

Das Dokument erscheint in:

deposit-license Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: deposit-license

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto