The effects of boredom due to being over- or underchallenged on students’ occupational choice intentions

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2016
Autor:innen
Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
EU-Projektnummer
DFG-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Sonstiges, Konferenz
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 2016, Washington, DC
Zusammenfassung

Objectives. Boredom is a commonly experienced emotion in academic settings (e.g., Goetz & Hall, 2014). Yet, very little research has investigated students’ boredom with regard to its antecedents and effects (e.g., Mercer-Lynn, Bar, & Eastwood, 2014; Smith, 1981). The present study addresses this issue by investigating the impact of being over- or underchallenged at school on students’ boredom and by examining the influence of such boredom experiences on occupational choice intentions.

Theoretical Framework and Research Questions. Boredom arises through a mismatch between the need for arousal and environmental stimulation (Fahlman, Mercer-Lynn, Flora, & Eastwood, 2013). In a school setting boredom often results from a mismatch between individuals’ ability and perceived challenge. More specifically, studies have shown that students tend to feel underchallenged when perceived control over the situation is high and task demands are below their ability. Similarly, perceived low control due to task demands being above ones abilities may lead to the feeling of being overchallenged (Pekrun et al., 2010). We assumed that both being under- and overchallenged may enhance boredom. Boredom has consistently been shown to have negative effects on students’ outcomes (e.g., Goetz & Hall, 2014). Based on the model of Eccles and colleagues (1983) and by drawing upon existing research we propose that boredom due to being under- and overchallenged should negatively predict occupational choice intentions related to the school subject, in which boredom occurred. We hypothesize that this effect will remain significant even when the direct effect of challenge on occupational choice is controlled.

Data and Method. The sample consisted of N = 662 Swiss high-school students (Mage = 17.69) from 35 classes. We used a questionnaire-based trait assessment of subject-specific (mathematics, German, French) boredom, challenge, and occupational choice intentions. Mediated path analyses with Mplus 7.11 (Muthén & Muthén, 1998-2012) were conducted to investigate the main effect of challenge on boredom (“too easy”, “just right”, “too difficult”), the main effect of boredom on occupational choice intentions and the effect of challenge on occupational choice intentions mediated by boredom while taking the clustered data structure (students within classes) into account.

Results and Discussion. As predicted, our results showed that for all three subjects a mismatch between perceived challenge and individual abilities lead to boredom. Under- or overchallenged students reported higher levels of boredom compared to students with optimal challenge. These findings are in line with research that deemed non-optimal challenge as an antecedent of boredom (e.g., Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). Furthermore, we demonstrated that both boredom due to being underchallenged and boredom due to being overchallenged negatively predicted students’ occupational choice intentions. The effects of boredom on occupational choice intentions remained significant even after controlling for the direct effect of students’ perceived challenge on occupational choice. The results of our study indicate that boredom at school occurs both due to being under- and overchallenged, and that boredom relates to occupational choice intentions even after the level of perceived challenge is held constant. Theoretical and practical implications will be discussed, along with directions for future inquiry.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
2016 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), 8. Apr. 2016 - 12. Apr. 2016, Washington, DC
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690KRANNICH, Maike, Thomas GÖTZ, Anastasiya A. LIPNEVICH, 2016. The effects of boredom due to being over- or underchallenged on students’ occupational choice intentions. 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Washington, DC, 8. Apr. 2016 - 12. Apr. 2016. In: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 2016, Washington, DC
BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34435">
    <dc:creator>Krannich, Maike</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-06-16T09:22:28Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/34435"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dcterms:title>The effects of boredom due to being over- or underchallenged on students’ occupational choice intentions</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-06-16T09:22:28Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Götz, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Objectives. Boredom is a commonly experienced emotion in academic settings (e.g., Goetz &amp; Hall, 2014). Yet, very little research has investigated students’ boredom with regard to its antecedents and effects (e.g., Mercer-Lynn, Bar, &amp; Eastwood, 2014; Smith, 1981). The present study addresses this issue by investigating the impact of being over- or underchallenged at school on students’ boredom and by examining the influence of such boredom experiences on occupational choice intentions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Theoretical Framework and Research Questions. Boredom arises through a mismatch between the need for arousal and environmental stimulation (Fahlman, Mercer-Lynn, Flora, &amp; Eastwood, 2013). In a school setting boredom often results from a mismatch between individuals’ ability and perceived challenge. More specifically, studies have shown that students tend to feel underchallenged when perceived control over the situation is high and task demands are below their ability. Similarly, perceived low control due to task demands being above ones abilities may lead to the feeling of being overchallenged (Pekrun et al., 2010). We assumed that both being under- and overchallenged may enhance boredom. Boredom has consistently been shown to have negative effects on students’ outcomes (e.g., Goetz &amp; Hall, 2014). Based on the model of Eccles and colleagues (1983) and by drawing upon existing research we propose that boredom due to being under- and overchallenged should negatively predict occupational choice intentions related to the school subject, in which boredom occurred. We hypothesize that this effect will remain significant even when the direct effect of challenge on occupational choice is controlled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Data and Method. The sample consisted of N = 662 Swiss high-school students (Mage = 17.69) from 35 classes. We used a questionnaire-based trait assessment of subject-specific (mathematics, German, French) boredom, challenge, and occupational choice intentions. Mediated path analyses with Mplus 7.11 (Muthén &amp; Muthén, 1998-2012) were conducted to investigate the main effect of challenge on boredom (“too easy”, “just right”, “too difficult”), the main effect of boredom on occupational choice intentions and the effect of challenge on occupational choice intentions mediated by boredom while taking the clustered data structure (students within classes) into account.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results and Discussion. As predicted, our results showed that for all three subjects a mismatch between perceived challenge and individual abilities lead to boredom. Under- or overchallenged students reported higher levels of boredom compared to students with optimal challenge. These findings are in line with research that deemed non-optimal challenge as an antecedent of boredom (e.g., Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). Furthermore, we demonstrated that both boredom due to being underchallenged and boredom due to being overchallenged negatively predicted students’ occupational choice intentions. The effects of boredom on occupational choice intentions remained significant even after controlling for the direct effect of students’ perceived challenge on occupational choice. The results of our study indicate that boredom at school occurs both due to being under- and overchallenged, and that boredom relates to occupational choice intentions even after the level of perceived challenge is held constant. Theoretical and practical implications will be discussed, along with directions for future inquiry.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Götz, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dc:contributor>Krannich, Maike</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet