Type of Publication: | Journal article |
Publication status: | Published |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-327529 |
Author: | Kupffer, Manfred |
Year of publication: | 2008 |
Published in: | Erkenntnis ; 68 (2008), 2. - pp. 225-238. - ISSN 0165-0106. - eISSN 1572-8420 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-007-9090-x |
Summary: |
Markus Werning attempts to refute Quine’s thesis that meaning is indeterminate. To this purpose he employs Hodges’ theorem about extensions of cofinal meaning functions. But the theorem does neither suffice to solve Quine’s problem nor the problem Werning mistakenly identifies with Quine’s. Nevertheless it makes sense to employ the methods used in Werning’s paper with regard to Quine’s thesis, only that they tell in favour of the thesis instead of against it.
|
Subject (DDC): | 100 Philosophy |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
KUPFFER, Manfred, 2008. An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?. In: Erkenntnis. 68(2), pp. 225-238. ISSN 0165-0106. eISSN 1572-8420. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10670-007-9090-x
@article{Kupffer2008-03Unint-33699, title={An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?}, year={2008}, doi={10.1007/s10670-007-9090-x}, number={2}, volume={68}, issn={0165-0106}, journal={Erkenntnis}, pages={225--238}, author={Kupffer, Manfred} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/33699"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33699"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/33699/1/Kupffer_0-327529.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-04-27T07:57:54Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-04-27T07:57:54Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2008-03</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Markus Werning attempts to refute Quine’s thesis that meaning is indeterminate. To this purpose he employs Hodges’ theorem about extensions of cofinal meaning functions. But the theorem does neither suffice to solve Quine’s problem nor the problem Werning mistakenly identifies with Quine’s. Nevertheless it makes sense to employ the methods used in Werning’s paper with regard to Quine’s thesis, only that they tell in favour of the thesis instead of against it.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:contributor>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:creator>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:title>An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/33699/1/Kupffer_0-327529.pdf"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Kupffer_0-327529.pdf | 306 |