An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:cd9358cfb1fdd5b6847c3baa5010516d

KUPFFER, Manfred, 2008. An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?. In: Erkenntnis. 68(2), pp. 225-238. ISSN 0165-0106. eISSN 1572-8420. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10670-007-9090-x

@article{Kupffer2008-03Unint-33699, title={An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?}, year={2008}, doi={10.1007/s10670-007-9090-x}, number={2}, volume={68}, issn={0165-0106}, journal={Erkenntnis}, pages={225--238}, author={Kupffer, Manfred} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/33699"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33699"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/page/termsofuse"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/33699/1/Kupffer_0-327529.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-04-27T07:57:54Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-04-27T07:57:54Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2008-03</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Markus Werning attempts to refute Quine’s thesis that meaning is indeterminate. To this purpose he employs Hodges’ theorem about extensions of cofinal meaning functions. But the theorem does neither suffice to solve Quine’s problem nor the problem Werning mistakenly identifies with Quine’s. Nevertheless it makes sense to employ the methods used in Werning’s paper with regard to Quine’s thesis, only that they tell in favour of the thesis instead of against it.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:contributor>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:creator>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:title>An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/33699/1/Kupffer_0-327529.pdf"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Apr 27, 2016 (Information about access statistics)

Kupffer_0-327529.pdf 167

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account