An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:cd9358cfb1fdd5b6847c3baa5010516d

KUPFFER, Manfred, 2008. An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?. In: Erkenntnis. 68(2), pp. 225-238. ISSN 0165-0106. eISSN 1572-8420

@article{Kupffer2008-03Unint-33699, title={An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?}, year={2008}, doi={10.1007/s10670-007-9090-x}, number={2}, volume={68}, issn={0165-0106}, journal={Erkenntnis}, pages={225--238}, author={Kupffer, Manfred} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2016-04-27T07:57:54Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2016-04-27T07:57:54Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2008-03</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Markus Werning attempts to refute Quine’s thesis that meaning is indeterminate. To this purpose he employs Hodges’ theorem about extensions of cofinal meaning functions. But the theorem does neither suffice to solve Quine’s problem nor the problem Werning mistakenly identifies with Quine’s. Nevertheless it makes sense to employ the methods used in Werning’s paper with regard to Quine’s thesis, only that they tell in favour of the thesis instead of against it.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Kupffer, Manfred</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>An Unintentional Defense of the Indeterminacy of Meaning?</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 27.04.2016 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Kupffer_0-327529.pdf 53

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto