KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

What causes the activation of contrastive alternatives, the size of focus domain or pitch accent type?

What causes the activation of contrastive alternatives, the size of focus domain or pitch accent type?

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:bee99a4f32411d0cb68f32eb7b8e00d6

BRAUN, Bettina, 2015. What causes the activation of contrastive alternatives, the size of focus domain or pitch accent type?. ICPhS 2015 : 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, Aug 10, 2015 - Aug 14, 2015. In: WOLTERS, Maria, ed. and others. ICPhS 2015 : 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ; Proceedings. IPA. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4

@inproceedings{Braun2015cause-32835, title={What causes the activation of contrastive alternatives, the size of focus domain or pitch accent type?}, url={http://www.icphs2015.info/pdfs/Papers/ICPHS0379.pdf}, year={2015}, isbn={978-0-85261-941-4}, publisher={IPA}, booktitle={ICPhS 2015 : 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ; Proceedings}, editor={Wolters, Maria}, author={Braun, Bettina} }

Braun, Bettina What causes the activation of contrastive alternatives, the size of focus domain or pitch accent type? 2016-02-03T11:56:25Z terms-of-use eng Theories of information structure argue that focus involves alternative sets; experimental studies have also shown that narrowly focused constituents lead to the activation of alternatives. However, narrow focus can be realized with different accent types, indicating the information status of the referent and it is unclear whether it is focus domain or accent type that conditions the activation of alternatives. In two visual-world eye-tracking experiments in German, we compared narrow focus conditions (Exp1: L+H*, Exp2: H+L*; narrow focus realized on the subject constituent) to a broad focus condition. We analysed participants' fixations to words that are contrastively related to the accented word while they processed the utterance.<br />Results showed that contrastive associates were not generally fixated more in narrow focus conditions, but only when the narrow focus is realized with an L+H* accent, suggesting that accent type plays a stronger role than focus domain in the activation of contrastive associates. 2015 Braun, Bettina 2016-02-03T11:56:25Z

Downloads since Feb 3, 2016 (Information about access statistics)

Braun_0-310649.pdf 87

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account