Type of Publication: | Journal article |
Author: | Weiss, Thomas G.; Welz, Martin |
Year of publication: | 2015 |
Published in: | Third World Quarterly ; 36 (2015), 8. - pp. 1493-1509. - ISSN 0143-6597. - eISSN 1360-2241 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1042969 |
Summary: |
Russia’s challenge to the post-cold war order, and the rise of Islamic State have resulted in a call for increased military spending among NATO members. Despite the increased demand for UN peace operations, any expansion is unlikely to benefit the world organisation. Instead we see an increasing reliance upon regional organisations like the African Union, European Union and NATO, in particular, for robust peace operations. An analysis of Western states (France, Germany and the USA) suggests that future investments in weaponry, technology and staff will primarily benefit NATO and the EU, but not the United Nations.
|
Subject (DDC): | 320 Politics |
Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |
WEISS, Thomas G., Martin WELZ, 2015. Military twists and turns in world politics : downsides or dividends for UN peace operations?. In: Third World Quarterly. 36(8), pp. 1493-1509. ISSN 0143-6597. eISSN 1360-2241. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1042969
@article{Weiss2015Milit-32091, title={Military twists and turns in world politics : downsides or dividends for UN peace operations?}, year={2015}, doi={10.1080/01436597.2015.1042969}, number={8}, volume={36}, issn={0143-6597}, journal={Third World Quarterly}, pages={1493--1509}, author={Weiss, Thomas G. and Welz, Martin} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/32091"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-11T09:10:07Z</dc:date> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Weiss, Thomas G.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/32091"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Welz, Martin</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Russia’s challenge to the post-cold war order, and the rise of Islamic State have resulted in a call for increased military spending among NATO members. Despite the increased demand for UN peace operations, any expansion is unlikely to benefit the world organisation. Instead we see an increasing reliance upon regional organisations like the African Union, European Union and NATO, in particular, for robust peace operations. An analysis of Western states (France, Germany and the USA) suggests that future investments in weaponry, technology and staff will primarily benefit NATO and the EU, but not the United Nations.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Weiss, Thomas G.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Welz, Martin</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Military twists and turns in world politics : downsides or dividends for UN peace operations?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-11T09:10:07Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>