KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Communicating eating-related rules : Suggestions are more effective than restrictions

Communicating eating-related rules : Suggestions are more effective than restrictions


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

STOK, F. Marijn, Emely DE VET, John B.F. DE WITT, Britta RENNER, Denise T.D. DE RIDDER, 2015. Communicating eating-related rules : Suggestions are more effective than restrictions. In: Appetite. 86, pp. 45-53. ISSN 0195-6663. eISSN 1095-8304. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.010

@article{Stok2015Commu-31154, title={Communicating eating-related rules : Suggestions are more effective than restrictions}, year={2015}, doi={10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.010}, volume={86}, issn={0195-6663}, journal={Appetite}, pages={45--53}, author={Stok, F. Marijn and de Vet, Emely and de Witt, John B.F. and Renner, Britta and de Ridder, Denise T.D.} }

Renner, Britta eng de Vet, Emely 2015-06-15T07:58:48Z Communicating eating-related rules : Suggestions are more effective than restrictions de Vet, Emely 2015-06-15T07:58:48Z de Witt, John B.F. de Ridder, Denise T.D. de Ridder, Denise T.D. Renner, Britta Stok, F. Marijn de Witt, John B.F. Background<br />A common social influence technique for curbing unhealthy eating behavior is to communicate eating-related rules (e.g. ‘you should not eat unhealthy food’). Previous research has shown that such restrictive rules sometimes backfire and actually increase unhealthy consumption. In the current studies, we aimed to investigate if a milder form of social influence, a suggested rule, is more successful in curbing intake of unhealthy food. We also investigated how both types of rules affected psychological reactance.<br /><br />Method<br />Students (N = 88 in Study 1, N = 51 in Study 2) completed a creativity task while a bowl of M&M's was within reach. Consumption was either explicitly forbidden (restrictive rule) or mildly discouraged (suggested rule). In the control condition, consumption was either explicitly allowed (Study 1) or M&M's were not provided (Study 2). Measures of reactance were assessed after the creativity task. Subsequently, a taste test was administered where all participants were allowed to consume M&M's.<br /><br />Results<br />Across both studies, consumption during the creativity task did not differ between the restrictive- and suggested-rule-conditions, indicating that both are equally successful in preventing initial consumption. Restrictive-rule-condition participants reported higher reactance and consumed more in the free-eating taste-test phase than suggested-rule-condition participants and control-group participants, indicating a negative after-effect of restriction.<br /><br />Discussion<br />Results show that there are more and less effective ways to communicate eating-related rules. A restrictive rule, as compared to a suggested rule, induced psychological reactance and led to greater unhealthy consumption when participants were allowed to eat freely. It is important to pay attention to the way in which eating-related rules are communicated. 2015 Stok, F. Marijn

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto