A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation
| Type of Publication: | Contribution to a conference collection |
| URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-285617 |
| Author: | Beel, Joeran; Genzmehr, Marcel; Langer, Stefan; Nürnberger, Andreas; Gipp, Bela |
| Year of publication: | 2013 |
| Conference: | RepSys '13, Oct 12, 2013, Hong Kong |
| Published in: | Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducibility and Replication in Recommender Systems Evaluation / Alejandro Bellogin (ed.). - New York : ACM, 2013. - pp. 7-14. - ISBN 978-1-4503-2465-6 |
| DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2532508.2532511 |
| Summary: |
Offline evaluations are the most common evaluation method for research paper recommender systems. However, no thorough discussion on the appropriateness of offline evaluations has taken place, despite some voiced criticism. We conducted a study in which we evaluated various recommendation approaches with both offline and online evaluations. We found that results of offline and online evaluations often contradict each other. We discuss this finding in detail and conclude that offline evaluations may be inappropriate for evaluating research paper recommender systems, in many settings.
|
| Subject (DDC): | 004 Computer Science |
| Keywords: | Research paper recommender systems, evaluation, offline evaluation, click-through rate, online evaluation, comparative study |
| Link to License: | In Copyright |
Cite This
Files in this item
![[PDF]](/themes/Kops/images/mimes/pdf.png "PDF file"){kind=small}
BEEL, Joeran, Marcel GENZMEHR, Stefan LANGER, Andreas NÜRNBERGER, Bela GIPP, 2013. A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation. RepSys '13. Hong Kong, Oct 12, 2013. In: ALEJANDRO BELLOGIN, , ed.. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducibility and Replication in Recommender Systems Evaluation. New York:ACM, pp. 7-14. ISBN 978-1-4503-2465-6. Available under: doi: 10.1145/2532508.2532511
@inproceedings{Beel2013compa-31055, title={A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation}, year={2013}, doi={10.1145/2532508.2532511}, isbn={978-1-4503-2465-6}, address={New York}, publisher={ACM}, booktitle={Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducibility and Replication in Recommender Systems Evaluation}, pages={7--14}, editor={Alejandro Bellogin}, author={Beel, Joeran and Genzmehr, Marcel and Langer, Stefan and Nürnberger, Andreas and Gipp, Bela} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/31055"> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31055/1/Beel_0-285617.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:creator>Gipp, Bela</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31055/1/Beel_0-285617.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-28T12:43:41Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Langer, Stefan</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Offline evaluations are the most common evaluation method for research paper recommender systems. However, no thorough discussion on the appropriateness of offline evaluations has taken place, despite some voiced criticism. We conducted a study in which we evaluated various recommendation approaches with both offline and online evaluations. We found that results of offline and online evaluations often contradict each other. We discuss this finding in detail and conclude that offline evaluations may be inappropriate for evaluating research paper recommender systems, in many settings.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Beel, Joeran</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Beel, Joeran</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Langer, Stefan</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:creator>Nürnberger, Andreas</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31055"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Gipp, Bela</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-28T12:43:41Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Genzmehr, Marcel</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Nürnberger, Andreas</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Genzmehr, Marcel</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Downloads since May 28, 2015 (Information about access statistics)
| Beel_0-285617.pdf | 1478 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Search KOPS
Browse
My Account
