Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

BRIESEN, Jochen, 2010. Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien. 80, pp. 221-234. ISSN 0165-9227. eISSN 1875-6735

@article{Briesen2010Recon-30237, title={Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism}, year={2010}, volume={80}, issn={0165-9227}, journal={Grazer Philosophische Studien}, pages={221--234}, author={Briesen, Jochen} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/30237"> <dc:creator>Briesen, Jochen</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Briesen, Jochen</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Anthony Brueckner (1994, 2005) argues for a strong connection between the closure and the underdetermination argument for scepticism. Moreover, he claims that both arguments rest on infallibilism: In order to motivate the premises of the arguments, the sceptic has to refer to an infallibility principle. If this were true, fallibilists would be right in not taking the problems posed by these sceptical arguments seriously. As many epistemologists are sympathetic to fallibilism, this would be a very interesting result. However, in this paper I will argue that Brueckner's claims are wrong: The closure and the underdetermination argument are not as closely related as he assumes and neither rests on infallibilism. Thus even a fallibilist should take these arguments to raise serious problems that must be dealt with somehow.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30237"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-12T12:24:26Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-12T12:24:26Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account