Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

BRIESEN, Jochen, 2010. Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien. 80, pp. 221-234. ISSN 0165-9227. eISSN 1875-6735

@article{Briesen2010Recon-30237, title={Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism}, year={2010}, volume={80}, issn={0165-9227}, journal={Grazer Philosophische Studien}, pages={221--234}, author={Briesen, Jochen} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dc:creator>Briesen, Jochen</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Briesen, Jochen</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Anthony Brueckner (1994, 2005) argues for a strong connection between the closure and the underdetermination argument for scepticism. Moreover, he claims that both arguments rest on infallibilism: In order to motivate the premises of the arguments, the sceptic has to refer to an infallibility principle. If this were true, fallibilists would be right in not taking the problems posed by these sceptical arguments seriously. As many epistemologists are sympathetic to fallibilism, this would be a very interesting result. However, in this paper I will argue that Brueckner's claims are wrong: The closure and the underdetermination argument are not as closely related as he assumes and neither rests on infallibilism. Thus even a fallibilist should take these arguments to raise serious problems that must be dealt with somehow.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2015-03-12T12:24:26Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2015-03-12T12:24:26Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto