KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles

Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)

Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:e48d6438a6e252d6b4b7a9964fa032a6

HAFFKE, Peter, Ronald HÜBNER, 2015. Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 5, 1597. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01597

@article{Haffke2015Effec-29936, title={Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles}, url={http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01597/}, year={2015}, doi={10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01597}, volume={5}, journal={Frontiers in Psychology}, author={Haffke, Peter and Hübner, Ronald}, note={Article Number: 1597} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/29936"> <dc:creator>Haffke, Peter</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Haffke, Peter</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-20T10:21:51Z</dc:date> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/29936/3/Haffke_0-279216.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/29936/3/Haffke_0-279216.pdf"/> <dcterms:title>Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/29936"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-20T10:21:51Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Most models of risky decision making assume that all relevant information is taken into account (e.g., von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944; Kahneman and Tversky, 1979). However, there are also some models supposing that only part of the information is considered (e.g., Brandstätter et al., 2006; Gigerenzer and Gaissmaier, 2011). To further investigate the amount of information that is usually used for decision making, and how the use depends on feedback, we conducted a series of three experiments in which participants choose between two lotteries and where no feedback, outcome feedback, and error feedback was provided, respectively. The results show that without feedback participants mostly chose the lottery with the higher winning probability, and largely ignored the potential gains. The same results occurred when the outcome of each decision was fed back. Only after presenting error feedback (i.e., signaling whether a choice was optimal or not), participants considered probabilities as well as gains, resulting in more optimal choices. We propose that outcome feedback was ineffective, because of its probabilistic and ambiguous nature. Participants improve information integration only if provided with a consistent and deterministic signal such as error feedback.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Feb 20, 2015 (Information about access statistics)

Haffke_0-279216.pdf 639

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search KOPS


My Account