Mapping the Ideological Networks of American Climate Politics

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

FISHER, Dana R., Philip LEIFELD, Yoko IWAKI, 2013. Mapping the Ideological Networks of American Climate Politics. In: Climatic Change. 116(3-4), pp. 523-545. ISSN 0165-0009. eISSN 1573-1480. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0512-7

@article{Fisher2013Mappi-29700, title={Mapping the Ideological Networks of American Climate Politics}, year={2013}, doi={10.1007/s10584-012-0512-7}, number={3-4}, volume={116}, issn={0165-0009}, journal={Climatic Change}, pages={523--545}, author={Fisher, Dana R. and Leifeld, Philip and Iwaki, Yoko} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dc:creator>Leifeld, Philip</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Fisher, Dana R.</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:title>Mapping the Ideological Networks of American Climate Politics</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Iwaki, Yoko</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Leifeld, Philip</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2015-02-02T10:26:05Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Iwaki, Yoko</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How do we understand national climate change politics in the United States? Using a methodological innovation in network analysis, this paper analyzes discussions about the issue within the US Congress. Through this analysis, the ideological relationships among speakers providing Congressional testimony on the issue of climate change are mapped. For the first time, issue stances of actors are systematically aggregated in order to measure coalitions and consensus among political actors in American climate politics in a relational way. Our findings show how consensus formed around the economic implications of regulating greenhouse gases and the policy instrument that should do the regulating. The paper is separated into three sections. First, we review the ways scholars have looked at climate change policymaking in the United States, paying particular attention to those who have looked at the issue within the US Congress. Next, we present analysis of statements made during Congressional hearings on climate change over a four-year period. Our analysis demonstrates how a polarized ideological actor space in the 109th Congress transforms into a more consensual actor landscape in the 110th Congress, which is significantly less guided by partisan differences. This paper concludes by discussing how these findings help us understand shifting positions within American climate politics and the implications of these findings.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2015-02-02T10:26:05Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Fisher, Dana R.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account