What Does It Mean That "Space Can Be Transcendental Without the Axioms Being So"?

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

BIAGIOLI, Francesca, 2014. What Does It Mean That "Space Can Be Transcendental Without the Axioms Being So"?. In: Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 45(1), pp. 1-21. ISSN 0925-4560. eISSN 1572-8587

@article{Biagioli2014"Spac-29446, title={What Does It Mean That "Space Can Be Transcendental Without the Axioms Being So"?}, year={2014}, doi={10.1007/s10838-013-9223-7}, number={1}, volume={45}, issn={0925-4560}, journal={Journal for General Philosophy of Science}, pages={1--21}, author={Biagioli, Francesca} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/29446"> <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>What Does It Mean That "Space Can Be Transcendental Without the Axioms Being So"?</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In 1870, Hermann von Helmholtz criticized the Kantian conception of geometrical axioms as a priori synthetic judgments grounded in spatial intuition. However, during his dispute with Albrecht Krause (Kant und Helmholtz über den Ursprung und die Bedeutung der Raumanschauung und der geometrischen Axiome. Lahr, Schauenburg, 1878), Helmholtz maintained that space can be transcendental without the axioms being so. In this paper, I will analyze Helmholtz’s claim in connection with his theory of measurement. Helmholtz uses a Kantian argument that can be summarized as follows: mathematical structures that can be defined independently of the objects we experience are necessary for judgments about magnitudes to be generally valid. I suggest that space is conceived by Helmholtz as one such structure. I will analyze his argument in its most detailed version, which is found in Helmholtz (Zählen und Messen, erkenntnistheoretisch betrachtet 1887. In: Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie. Springer, Berlin, 1921, 70–97). In support of my view, I will consider alternative formulations of the same argument by Ernst Cassirer and Otto Hölder.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/29446"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-12-16T14:42:44Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-12-16T14:42:44Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Biagioli, Francesca</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Biagioli, Francesca</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto