Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

URBANIOK, Frank, Arja LAUBACHER, Judith HARDEGGER, Astrid ROSSEGGER, Jérôme ENDRASS, Konstantin MOSKVITIN, 2012. Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility. In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 56(2), pp. 174-190. ISSN 0306-624X. eISSN 1552-6933. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0306624X10395474

@article{Urbaniok2012-04Neuro-28201, title={Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility}, year={2012}, doi={10.1177/0306624X10395474}, number={2}, volume={56}, issn={0306-624X}, journal={International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology}, pages={174--190}, author={Urbaniok, Frank and Laubacher, Arja and Hardegger, Judith and Rossegger, Astrid and Endrass, Jérôme and Moskvitin, Konstantin} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Laubacher, Arja</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Hardegger, Judith</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Several authors have argued that criminal behavior is generally caused by neurobiological deficits. This assumption not only questions the concept of free will and a person’s responsibility for his or her own actions but also the principle of guilt in criminal law. When critically examining the current state of research, it becomes apparent that the results are not sufficient to support the existence of a universally valid neurobiological causality of criminal behavior. Moreover, the assumption of total neurobiological determination of human behavior and the impossibility of individual responsibility are characterized by both faulty empiricism and methodical misconceptions. The principle of relative determinism and the analysis of the offender’s behavior at the time of the offense thus remain the central and cogent approach to the assessment of criminal responsibility.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2014-06-26T13:47:08Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Urbaniok, Frank</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Moskvitin, Konstantin</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Rossegger, Astrid</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Urbaniok, Frank</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Laubacher, Arja</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2012-04</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Endrass, Jérôme</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:title>Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2014-06-26T13:47:08Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Moskvitin, Konstantin</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Endrass, Jérôme</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Hardegger, Judith</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology ; 56 (2012), 2. - S. 174-190</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:contributor>Rossegger, Astrid</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto