KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform : Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies

Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform : Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

KNILL, Christoph, 1999. Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform : Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies. In: Journal of Public Policy. 19(2), pp. 113-139. ISSN 0143-814X. eISSN 1469-7815

@article{Knill1999Expla-26716, title={Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform : Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies}, year={1999}, number={2}, volume={19}, issn={0143-814X}, journal={Journal of Public Policy}, pages={113--139}, author={Knill, Christoph} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/26716"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Notwithstanding an ever-growing body of literature on administrative reforms, the studies either focus on single countries or emphasize common tendencies in all countries; hence providing little systematic insight for the evaluation and explanation of administrative change from a comparative perspective. In the light of this deficit, it is the aim of this article to develop an analytical concept for explaining cross-national variances in patterns of administrative development. For this purpose, the concept of national administrative reform capacity is developed, arguing that the potential for reforming different administrative systems is basically dependent on the general institutional context in which these systems are embedded. On this basis, two ideal type constellations of administrative reform capacity and corresponding patterns of administrative development are identified and illustrated by a systematic comparison of administrative reform capacities and administrative changes in Germany and Britain.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Knill, Christoph</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform : Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Knill, Christoph</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-18T14:33:40Z</dc:date> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Journal of Public Policy ; 19 (1999), 2. - S. 113-139</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-18T14:33:40Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26716"/> <dcterms:issued>1999</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account