The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

LANGKAU, Julia, 2013. The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions. In: HOELTJE, Miguel, ed., Thomas SPITZLEY, ed., Wolfgang SPOHN, ed.. Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V.. Duisburg:DuEPublico, pp. 352-364. ISBN 978-3-00-042332-1

@inproceedings{Langkau2013Metho-26628, title={The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions}, year={2013}, isbn={978-3-00-042332-1}, address={Duisburg}, publisher={DuEPublico}, booktitle={Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V.}, pages={352--364}, editor={Hoeltje, Miguel and Spitzley, Thomas and Spohn, Wolfgang}, author={Langkau, Julia} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/26628"> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T10:27:24Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Langkau, Julia</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Reflective equilibrium has been considered a paradigm method involving intuitions. Some philosophers have recently claimed that it is trivial and can even accommodate the sort of scepticism about the reliability of intuitions advocated by experimental philosophers. I discuss several ways in which reflective equilibrium could be thought of as trivial and argue that it is inconsistent with scepticism about the reliability of intuitions.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26628"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:title>The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/page/termsofuse"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T10:27:24Z</dc:date> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. / Miguel Hoeltje, Thomas Spitzley und Wolfgang Spohn (eds.). - Duisburg : DuEPublico, 2013. - S. 352-364. - ISBN 978-3-00-042332-1</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:creator>Langkau, Julia</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account