The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions
| Type of Publication: | Contribution to a conference collection |
| Author: | Langkau, Julia |
| Year of publication: | 2013 |
| Published in: | Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. / Hoeltje, Miguel; Spitzley, Thomas; Spohn, Wolfgang (ed.). - Duisburg : DuEPublico, 2013. - pp. 352-364. - ISBN 978-3-00-042332-1 |
| Summary: |
Reflective equilibrium has been considered a paradigm method involving intuitions. Some philosophers have recently claimed that it is trivial and can even accommodate the sort of scepticism about the reliability of intuitions advocated by experimental philosophers. I discuss several ways in which reflective equilibrium could be thought of as trivial and argue that it is inconsistent with scepticism about the reliability of intuitions.
|
| Subject (DDC): | 100 Philosophy |
| Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Cite This
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||
LANGKAU, Julia, 2013. The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions. In: HOELTJE, Miguel, ed., Thomas SPITZLEY, ed., Wolfgang SPOHN, ed.. Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V.. Duisburg:DuEPublico, pp. 352-364. ISBN 978-3-00-042332-1
@inproceedings{Langkau2013Metho-26628, title={The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions}, year={2013}, isbn={978-3-00-042332-1}, address={Duisburg}, publisher={DuEPublico}, booktitle={Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V.}, pages={352--364}, editor={Hoeltje, Miguel and Spitzley, Thomas and Spohn, Wolfgang}, author={Langkau, Julia} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/26628"> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T10:27:24Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Langkau, Julia</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Reflective equilibrium has been considered a paradigm method involving intuitions. Some philosophers have recently claimed that it is trivial and can even accommodate the sort of scepticism about the reliability of intuitions advocated by experimental philosophers. I discuss several ways in which reflective equilibrium could be thought of as trivial and argue that it is inconsistent with scepticism about the reliability of intuitions.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26628"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:title>The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and Intuitions</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T10:27:24Z</dc:date> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. / Miguel Hoeltje, Thomas Spitzley und Wolfgang Spohn (eds.). - Duisburg : DuEPublico, 2013. - S. 352-364. - ISBN 978-3-00-042332-1</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:creator>Langkau, Julia</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Search KOPS
Browse
My Account
