KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?

Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

ENGELEN, Eva-Maria, 2013. Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?. In: Philosophia Scientiae. 17(1), pp. 167-188. eISSN 1281-2463

@article{Engelen2013Godel-25173, title={Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?}, year={2013}, number={1}, volume={17}, journal={Philosophia Scientiae}, pages={167--188}, author={Engelen, Eva-Maria} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/25173"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-20140905103605204-4002607-1"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/25173"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-20T16:31:18Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Engelen, Eva-Maria</dc:contributor> <dcterms:alternative>Has Kurt Gödel received Thomas Aquinas’ Commentary on Aristotle’s „De anima“?</dcterms:alternative> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">Abstract: The search for an answer to the question that constitutes the title has led to some insightful results concerning Kurt Gödel’s critical reception of major philosophical works. It shows how he uses philosophical argumentations of classical authors and turns them into new aspects for his own philosophical argumentation. In the case at hand a classical argument by Aristotle for the immaterialness of the soul is used by Gödel in order to add considerations to his own reasoning for the inexhaustibility of mathematics, the mind-body-problem and his considerations about God; and vice versa to give new insights into an argument with a long history of reception.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Philosophia Scientiae ; 17 (2013), 1. - S. 167-188</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:rights>deposit-license</dc:rights> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-20T16:31:18Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Engelen, Eva-Maria</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto