Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN

Leitner-Fischer, Florian

Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN

Dateien

Leitner_212939.pdfGröße: 1.25 MBDownloads: 116

Datum

2008

Autor:innen

Leitner-Fischer, Florian

Schriftenreihe

Technical Report, Chair for Software Engineering, University of Konstanz ; soft-08-05

URI (zitierfähiger Link)

http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-212939

Link zur Lizenz

Urheberrechtlich geschützt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Informatik und Informationswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Working Paper/Technical Report

Publikationsstatus

Published

Zusammenfassung

An increasing number of industrial strength software design tools come along with verification tools that o er some property checking capabilities. On the other hand, there is a large number of general purpose model checking tools available. The question whether users of the industrial strength design tool preferably use the built-in verification tool or a general purpose model checking tool arises quite naturally. In this bachelor thesis, the Simulink Design Verifier and the SPIN model checking tool are compared. The comparison is based on the case study of an AUTOSAR compliant memory management module. The comparison is both functional in that it analyzes the suitability to verify a set of basic system properties, and quantitative in comparing the computational efficiency of both tools. In this context, it is also described how Simulink / Stateflow models can be manually translated into the input language of the model checker SPIN.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

004 Informatik

Zitieren

ISO 690

LEITNER-FISCHER, Florian, 2008. Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN

BibTex

@techreport{LeitnerFischer2008Evalu-21293,
  year={2008},
  series={Technical Report, Chair for Software Engineering, University of Konstanz ; soft-08-05},
  title={Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN},
  author={Leitner-Fischer, Florian}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/21293">
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">An increasing number of industrial strength software design tools come along with verification tools that o er some property checking capabilities. On the other hand, there is a large number of general purpose model checking tools available. The question whether users of the industrial strength design tool preferably use the built-in verification tool or a general purpose model checking tool arises quite naturally. In this bachelor thesis, the Simulink Design Verifier and the SPIN model checking tool are compared. The comparison is based on the case study of an AUTOSAR compliant memory management module. The comparison is both functional in that it analyzes the suitability to verify a set of basic system properties, and quantitative in comparing the computational efficiency of both tools. In this context, it is also described how Simulink / Stateflow models can be manually translated into the input language of the model checker SPIN.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/21293/1/Leitner_212939.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-01-30T09:58:44Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Leitner-Fischer, Florian</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/21293"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/21293/1/Leitner_212939.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-01-30T09:58:44Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Leitner-Fischer, Florian</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein