Does attentional selectivity in the flanker task improve discretely or gradually?


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:4bef12757102853cc4ef00947d338460

HÜBNER, Ronald, Lisa TÖBEL, 2012. Does attentional selectivity in the flanker task improve discretely or gradually?. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 3, 434. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00434

@article{Hubner2012atten-21220, title={Does attentional selectivity in the flanker task improve discretely or gradually?}, year={2012}, doi={10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00434}, volume={3}, journal={Frontiers in Psychology}, author={Hübner, Ronald and Töbel, Lisa}, note={Article Number: 434} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dc:contributor>Töbel, Lisa</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:abstract>An important question is whether attentional selectivity improves discretely or continuously during stimulus processing. In a recent study, Hübner et al. (2010) found that the discrete Dual-Stage Two-Phase (DSTP) model accounted better for flanker-task data than various continuous-improvement models. However, in a subsequent study, White et al. (2011) introduced the continuous shrinking-spotlight (SSP) model and showed that it was superior to the DSTP model. From this result they concluded that attentional selectivity improves continuously rather than discretely. Because different stimuli and procedures were used in these two studies, though, we questioned that the superiority of the SSP model holds generally. Therefore, we fit the SSP model to Hübner et al.'s data and found that the DSTP model was again superior. A series of four experiments revealed that model superiority depends on the response-stimulus interval. Together, our results demonstrate that methodological details can be crucial for model selection, and that further comparisons between the models are needed before it can be decided whether attentional selectivity improves continuously or discretely.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Frontiers in Psychology ; 3 (2012). - 434</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:title>Does attentional selectivity in the flanker task improve discretely or gradually?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2013-01-23T12:45:12Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2013-01-23T12:45:12Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Töbel, Lisa</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 01.10.2014 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

huebner_212206.pdf 153

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto