KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness

Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:e402a7163a5f493dc40886d57579844c

NENKOV, Gergana Y., Peter GOLLWITZER, 2012. Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48(1), pp. 106-121. ISSN 0022-1031. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.002

@article{Nenkov2012Preve-17367, title={Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness}, year={2012}, doi={10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.002}, number={1}, volume={48}, issn={0022-1031}, journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology}, pages={106--121}, author={Nenkov, Gergana Y. and Gollwitzer, Peter} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/17367"> <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17367/1/Nenkov_Gollwitzer_postdecisional.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/17367"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Nenkov, Gergana Y.</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-21T07:53:37Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-21T07:53:37Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>Pre-versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment : The positive effects of defensiveness</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Nenkov, Gergana Y.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Building on Gollwitzer's (1990) mindset theory of action phases, it is proposed that the effects of assigned balanced deliberation on subsequent goal commitment are moderated by people's pre- versus postdecisional status. A balanced deliberation and impartial assessment of pros and cons is expected to reduce goal commitment in predecisional individuals, whereas a distortion of the assigned balanced deliberation and a partial focus on the pros of goal pursuit should defend and strengthen goal commitment in postdecisional individuals. Indeed, in Study 1, assigned deliberation on the pros and cons of pursuing a focal goal promoted stronger reported goal commitment in participants who had decided to pursue this goal, but reduced goal commitment for people who had not yet made such a decision. In Study 2, the same pattern of results emerged when goal commitment was indicated by planning to act on the goal. Study 3 replicated findings using a different decision status manipulation and goal persistence as a measure of commitment. Finally, results of Study 4 suggested that the increase in commitment produced by defensive postdecisional deliberation is consequential as it was found to drive real-life behavior by promoting goal-directed action. Moreover, Studies 2, 3, and 4 explored the underlying process and provided evidence that it is the partial focus on the pros of goal pursuit, meant to defend existing goal commitment, that drives postdecisional deliberation's strengthening effects on goal commitment. Implications for mindset theory, goal commitmenttheory, and decision making are discussed.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology ; 48 (2012), 1. - pp. 106-121</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/17367/1/Nenkov_Gollwitzer_postdecisional.pdf"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Oct 1, 2014 (Information about access statistics)

Nenkov_Gollwitzer_postdecisional.pdf 1526

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account