Driving forces behind informal sanctions

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

FALK, Armin, Ernst FEHR, Urs FISCHBACHER, 2005. Driving forces behind informal sanctions. In: Econometrica. 73(6), pp. 2017-2030. ISSN 0012-9682

@article{Falk2005Drivi-16668, title={Driving forces behind informal sanctions}, year={2005}, doi={10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00644.x}, number={6}, volume={73}, issn={0012-9682}, journal={Econometrica}, pages={2017--2030}, author={Falk, Armin and Fehr, Ernst and Fischbacher, Urs} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/16668"> <dcterms:issued>2005</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-16T05:59:48Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Econometrica ; 73 (2005), 6. - S. 2017–2030</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:rights>deposit-license</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Fehr, Ernst</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper investigates the driving forces behind informal sanctions in cooperation games and the extent to which theories of fairness and reciprocity capture these forces. We find that cooperators' punishment is almost exclusively targeted toward the defectors, but the latter also impose a considerable amount of spiteful punishment on the cooperators. However, spiteful punishment vanishes if the punishers can no longer affect the payoff differences between themselves and the punished individual, whereas the cooperators even increase the resources devoted to punishment in this case. Our data also discriminate between different fairness principles. Fairness theories that are based on the assumption that players compare their own payoff to the group's average or the group's total payoff cannot explain the fact that cooperators target their punishment at the defectors. Fairness theories that assume that players aim to minimize payoff inequalities cannot explain the fact that cooperators punish defectors even if payoff inequalities cannot be reduced. Therefore, retaliation, i.e., the desire to harm those who committed unfair acts, seems to be the most important motive behind fairness-driven informal sanctions.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Falk, Armin</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-16T05:59:48Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/16668"/> <dc:creator>Fehr, Ernst</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Falk, Armin</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Driving forces behind informal sanctions</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-20140905103605204-4002607-1"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto