Type of Publication: | Journal article |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-136735 |
Author: | Spohn, Wolfgang |
Year of publication: | 1981 |
Published in: | Erkenntnis ; 16 (1981), 1. - ISSN 0165-0106 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00219641 |
Summary: |
The first part of the note makes some critical remarks on Niniluoto (1981) (in the same issue), arriving at the conclusion that the systems proposed by Niiniluoto fail to satisfy symmetry, positive instantial relevance, and the Reichenbach axiom, and are thus more defective than seems acceptable. As I try to show in the second constructive part, positive instantial relevance and the Reichenbach axiom may be regained for analogical inference. The note closes with some general skeptical remarks to the effect that by trying to accommodate analogy considerations inductive logic regresses to subjectivism.
|
Subject (DDC): | 100 Philosophy |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
SPOHN, Wolfgang, 1981. Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto. In: Erkenntnis. 16(1). ISSN 0165-0106. Available under: doi: 10.1007/BF00219641
@article{Spohn1981Analo-13673, title={Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto}, year={1981}, doi={10.1007/BF00219641}, number={1}, volume={16}, issn={0165-0106}, journal={Erkenntnis}, author={Spohn, Wolfgang} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/13673"> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13673/2/Spohn_Analogy.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13673"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Erkenntnis ; 16 (1981), 1. - pp. 35-52</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-27T08:00:20Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>1981</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-27T08:00:20Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Analogy and inductive logic : A note on Niiniluoto</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The first part of the note makes some critical remarks on Niniluoto (1981) (in the same issue), arriving at the conclusion that the systems proposed by Niiniluoto fail to satisfy symmetry, positive instantial relevance, and the Reichenbach axiom, and are thus more defective than seems acceptable. As I try to show in the second constructive part, positive instantial relevance and the Reichenbach axiom may be regained for analogical inference. The note closes with some general skeptical remarks to the effect that by trying to accommodate analogy considerations inductive logic regresses to subjectivism.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13673/2/Spohn_Analogy.pdf"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Spohn_Analogy.pdf | 359 |