Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences
| Publikationstyp: | Beitrag zu einem Sammelband |
| URI (zitierfähiger Link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-135750 |
| Autor/innen: | Spohn, Wolfgang |
| Erscheinungsjahr: | 2011 |
| Erschienen in: | Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation / Dieks, Dennis; Gonzalez, Wenceslao J.; Hartmann, Stephan; Uebel, Thomas; Weber, Marcel (Hrsg.). - Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2011. - S. 241-251. - ISBN 978-94-007-1179-2 |
| DOI (zitierfähiger Link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_16 |
| Zusammenfassung: |
In this paper I take the human sciences to comprise psychology, social, economic, and political sciences, archaeology, history, ethnology, linguistics, philologies, literary and cultural studies, and similar fields having emerged besides and in between. So, the human sciences study the individual and collective ways and products of the human mind. After the term “Geisteswissenschaften” has narrowed its meaning, the term “Humanwissenschaften”, “human sciences”, seems more appropriate. By contrast, the natural sciences are to comprise all the other fields of empirical study, physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, geology, engineering, etc. In this paper I would like to give an update of, and a fresh attempt at, the longstanding heated issue whether or not there is a principled difference between the human and the natural sciences.
|
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 100 Philosophie |
| Link zur Lizenz: | Nutzungsbedingungen |
| Universitätsbibliographie: | Ja |
Zitieren
Dateien zu dieser Ressource
![[PDF]](/themes/Kops/images/mimes/pdf.png "PDF file"){kind=small}
SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2011. Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences. In: DIEKS, Dennis, ed., Wenceslao J. GONZALEZ, ed., Stephan HARTMANN, ed., Thomas UEBEL, ed., Marcel WEBER, ed.. Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands, pp. 241-251. ISBN 978-94-007-1179-2. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_16
@incollection{Spohn2011Norma-13575, title={Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences}, year={2011}, doi={10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_16}, isbn={978-94-007-1179-2}, address={Dordrecht}, publisher={Springer Netherlands}, booktitle={Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation}, pages={241--251}, editor={Dieks, Dennis and Gonzalez, Wenceslao J. and Hartmann, Stephan and Uebel, Thomas and Weber, Marcel}, author={Spohn, Wolfgang} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/13575"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-09-15T05:46:51Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-08-31T22:25:04Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation / Dennis Dieks ... (Eds.). Dordrecht : Springer, 2011, S. 241-251 (The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective ; 2)</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13575/2/spohn_normativity.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this paper I take the human sciences to comprise psychology, social, economic, and political sciences, archaeology, history, ethnology, linguistics, philologies, literary and cultural studies, and similar fields having emerged besides and in between. So, the human sciences study the individual and collective ways and products of the human mind. After the term “Geisteswissenschaften” has narrowed its meaning, the term “Humanwissenschaften”, “human sciences”, seems more appropriate. By contrast, the natural sciences are to comprise all the other fields of empirical study, physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, geology, engineering, etc. In this paper I would like to give an update of, and a fresh attempt at, the longstanding heated issue whether or not there is a principled difference between the human and the natural sciences.</dcterms:abstract> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13575/2/spohn_normativity.pdf"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13575"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/page/termsofuse"/> <dcterms:title>Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Dateiabrufe seit 01.10.2014 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)
| spohn_normativity.pdf | 112 |
Das Dokument erscheint in:
KOPS Suche
Stöbern
Mein Benutzerkonto
