Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences
Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können am Montag, 6.2. und Dienstag, 7.2. keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted on Monday, Feb. 6 and Tuesday, Feb. 7.)
| Type of Publication: | Contribution to a collection |
| URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-135750 |
| Author: | Spohn, Wolfgang |
| Year of publication: | 2011 |
| Published in: | Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation / Dieks, Dennis; Gonzalez, Wenceslao J.; Hartmann, Stephan; Uebel, Thomas; Weber, Marcel (ed.). - Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2011. - pp. 241-251. - ISBN 978-94-007-1179-2 |
| DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_16 |
| Summary: |
In this paper I take the human sciences to comprise psychology, social, economic, and political sciences, archaeology, history, ethnology, linguistics, philologies, literary and cultural studies, and similar fields having emerged besides and in between. So, the human sciences study the individual and collective ways and products of the human mind. After the term “Geisteswissenschaften” has narrowed its meaning, the term “Humanwissenschaften”, “human sciences”, seems more appropriate. By contrast, the natural sciences are to comprise all the other fields of empirical study, physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, geology, engineering, etc. In this paper I would like to give an update of, and a fresh attempt at, the longstanding heated issue whether or not there is a principled difference between the human and the natural sciences.
|
| Subject (DDC): | 100 Philosophy |
| Link to License: | In Copyright |
| Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Cite This
Files in this item
![[PDF]](/themes/Kops/images/mimes/pdf.png "PDF file"){kind=small}
SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2011. Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences. In: DIEKS, Dennis, ed., Wenceslao J. GONZALEZ, ed., Stephan HARTMANN, ed., Thomas UEBEL, ed., Marcel WEBER, ed.. Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands, pp. 241-251. ISBN 978-94-007-1179-2. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_16
@incollection{Spohn2011Norma-13575, title={Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences}, year={2011}, doi={10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_16}, isbn={978-94-007-1179-2}, address={Dordrecht}, publisher={Springer Netherlands}, booktitle={Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation}, pages={241--251}, editor={Dieks, Dennis and Gonzalez, Wenceslao J. and Hartmann, Stephan and Uebel, Thomas and Weber, Marcel}, author={Spohn, Wolfgang} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/13575"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-09-15T05:46:51Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-08-31T22:25:04Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation / Dennis Dieks ... (Eds.). Dordrecht : Springer, 2011, S. 241-251 (The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective ; 2)</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13575/2/spohn_normativity.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this paper I take the human sciences to comprise psychology, social, economic, and political sciences, archaeology, history, ethnology, linguistics, philologies, literary and cultural studies, and similar fields having emerged besides and in between. So, the human sciences study the individual and collective ways and products of the human mind. After the term “Geisteswissenschaften” has narrowed its meaning, the term “Humanwissenschaften”, “human sciences”, seems more appropriate. By contrast, the natural sciences are to comprise all the other fields of empirical study, physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, geology, engineering, etc. In this paper I would like to give an update of, and a fresh attempt at, the longstanding heated issue whether or not there is a principled difference between the human and the natural sciences.</dcterms:abstract> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13575/2/spohn_normativity.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13575"/> <dcterms:title>Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Downloads since Oct 1, 2014 (Information about access statistics)
| spohn_normativity.pdf | 412 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Search KOPS
Browse
My Account
