KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Fostering Team Innovation : why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?

Fostering Team Innovation : why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

GEBERT, Diether, Sabine BOERNER, Eric KEARNEY, 2010. Fostering Team Innovation : why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?. In: Organization Science. 21(3), pp. 593-608. ISSN 1047-7039. Available under: doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0485

@article{Gebert2010Foste-12827, title={Fostering Team Innovation : why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?}, year={2010}, doi={10.1287/orsc.1090.0485}, number={3}, volume={21}, issn={1047-7039}, journal={Organization Science}, pages={593--608}, author={Gebert, Diether and Boerner, Sabine and Kearney, Eric} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/12827"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We develop a framework that provides a general theoretical rationale for the claim made by several authors that combining opposing action strategies fosters team innovation. We distinguish between open and closed strategies and posit that these are opposing but complementary in that each fosters one of two processes necessary for team innovation: open action strategies (e.g., delegative leadership) promote knowledge generation, and closed action strategies (e.g., directive leadership) enhance knowledge integration. We argue that each pole of a pair of opposing action strategies both energizes and detracts from elements of innovation. Thus, it could be expected that combining opposing action strategies leads to an impasse, as the negative effects of each strategy might offset the positive effects of the opposite strategy. There is currently no viable explanation in the literature for why this mutual neutralization may not occur. We aim to fill this gap by explicating why and how opposing action strategies, when implemented simultaneously, do not countervail each other's positive effects, but rather yield positive synergies that fuel team innovation.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Boerner, Sabine</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:creator>Kearney, Eric</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Organization Science 21 (2010), 3, pp. 593-608</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-07-15T08:34:23Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Fostering Team Innovation : why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Gebert, Diether</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-07-15T08:34:23Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Boerner, Sabine</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Kearney, Eric</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Gebert, Diether</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>deposit-license</dc:rights> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/12827"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-20140905103605204-4002607-1"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto