KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge

Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Dateien Größe Format Anzeige

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

KOCHAN, Jeff, 2010. Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. In: Social Studies of Science. 40(1), pp. 127-144. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0306312709104780

@article{Kochan2010Contr-12528, title={Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge}, year={2010}, doi={10.1177/0306312709104780}, number={1}, volume={40}, journal={Social Studies of Science}, pages={127--144}, author={Kochan, Jeff} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/12528"> <dcterms:title>Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-04-15T05:58:14Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-04-15T05:58:14Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this essay, I address a novel criticism recently levelled at the Strong Programme by Nick Tosh and Tim Lewens. Tosh and Lewens paint Strong Programme theorists as trading on a contrastive form of explanation. With this, they throw valuable new light on the explanatory methods employed by the Strong Programme. However, as I shall argue, Tosh and Lewens run into trouble when they accuse Strong Programme theorists of unduly restricting the contrast space in which legitimate historical and sociological explanations of scientific knowledge might be given. Their attack founders as a result of their failure to properly understand the overall methodological concerns of Strong Programme theorists. After introducing readers to the technique of contrastive explanation and correcting the errors in Tosh and Lewens’ interpretation of the Strong Programme, I argue that it is, in fact, Tosh and Lewens’ own commitment to scientific realism which places an unacceptable restriction on the explanatory space open to historians and sociologists of science. The happy ending is that the Strong Programme provides more freedom for analysis than does scientific realism, and that careful attention to the methodological benefits of contrastive explanation can help lighten the burden on historians and sociologists of science as they go about their explanatory business.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/page/termsofuse"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Social Studies of Science ; 40 (2010), 1. - pp. 127-144</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Kochan, Jeff</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/12528"/> <dc:contributor>Kochan, Jeff</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Mein Benutzerkonto