KOPS - Das Institutionelle Repositorium der Universität Konstanz

Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types

Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:76cc89c4e488bcc23861e7df1b9dcf50

MAIER, Martin, Marco STEINHAUSER, Ronald HÜBNER, 2008. Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20(12), pp. 2263-2273

@article{Maier2008Error-10814, title={Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types}, year={2008}, doi={10.1162/jocn.2008.20159}, number={12}, volume={20}, journal={Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience}, pages={2263--2273}, author={Maier, Martin and Steinhauser, Marco and Hübner, Ronald} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/10814"> <dc:creator>Maier, Martin</dc:creator> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:22:53Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Steinhauser, Marco</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10814"/> <dcterms:title>Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? : Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-20140905103416863-3868037-7"/> <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:22:53Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (2008), 12, pp. 2263-2273</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:rights>deposit-license</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The present study tested error detection theories of the error-related negativity (ERN) by investigating the relation between ERN amplitude and error detectability. To this end, ERN amplitudes were compared with a behavioral measure of error detectability across two different error types in a fourchoice flanker task. If an erroneous response was associated with the flankers, it was considered a flanker error, otherwise it was considered a nonflanker error. Two experiments revealed that, whereas detectability was better for nonflanker errors than for flanker errors, ERN amplitudes were larger for flanker errors than for nonflanker errors. Moreover, undetected errors led to strongly reduced ERN amplitudes relative to detected errors. These results suggest that, although error detection is necessary for an ERN to occur, the ERN amplitude is not related to error detectability but rather to error significance.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Maier, Martin</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 01.10.2014 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Is_the_Error_related_Negativity.pdf 159

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto