Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions
Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions
Date
2009
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition ; 35 (2009), 4. - pp. 905-915
Abstract
In everyday life, one can link anticipated specific cues (e.g. visiting a restaurant) with desired actions (e.g., ordering a healthy meal). Alternatively, intentions such as "I intend to eat more healthily" present the option to act when one encounters the same cue. In the first case, a specific cue triggers a specific action; in the second, one must act in a more self-initiated manner. The authors compared such scenarios using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were either instructed to respond in a particular manner to target events (cued condition) or told that they would score points for such responses, without being told that they were necessary (self-initiated condition). Although conditions differed only in the wording of instructions, the self-initiated condition was associated with poorer performance and greater activity in a predominantly frontoparietal network. Responses to targets in the self-initiated and cued conditions yielded greater activity in lateral and medial Brodmann area 10, respectively. The authors suggest that these results reflect differing demands for self-initiated versus externally cued behavior following different types of instruction, in line with the distinction between goal intentions and implementation intentions proposed by P. M. Gollwitzer and colleagues.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
fMRI,implementation intentions,prefrontal cortex,prospective memory,self-regulation
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
GILBERT, Sam J., Peter M. GOLLWITZER, Anna-Lisa COHEN, Gabriele OETTINGEN, Paul W. BURGESS, 2009. Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 35(4), pp. 905-915. Available under: doi: 10.1037/a0015535BibTex
@article{Gilbert2009Separ-10150, year={2009}, doi={10.1037/a0015535}, title={Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions}, number={4}, volume={35}, journal={Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition}, pages={905--915}, author={Gilbert, Sam J. and Gollwitzer, Peter M. and Cohen, Anna-Lisa and Oettingen, Gabriele and Burgess, Paul W.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10150"> <dc:creator>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:14:33Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Burgess, Paul W.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In everyday life, one can link anticipated specific cues (e.g. visiting a restaurant) with desired actions (e.g., ordering a healthy meal). Alternatively, intentions such as "I intend to eat more healthily" present the option to act when one encounters the same cue. In the first case, a specific cue triggers a specific action; in the second, one must act in a more self-initiated manner. The authors compared such scenarios using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were either instructed to respond in a particular manner to target events (cued condition) or told that they would score points for such responses, without being told that they were necessary (self-initiated condition). Although conditions differed only in the wording of instructions, the self-initiated condition was associated with poorer performance and greater activity in a predominantly frontoparietal network. Responses to targets in the self-initiated and cued conditions yielded greater activity in lateral and medial Brodmann area 10, respectively. The authors suggest that these results reflect differing demands for self-initiated versus externally cued behavior following different types of instruction, in line with the distinction between goal intentions and implementation intentions proposed by P. M. Gollwitzer and colleagues.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:14:33Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:title>Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Gilbert, Sam J.</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10150/1/Separable_brain_Systems_2009.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Burgess, Paul W.</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Gilbert, Sam J.</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10150/1/Separable_brain_Systems_2009.pdf"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (2009), 4, pp. 905-915</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:creator>Cohen, Anna-Lisa</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10150"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes