Publikation: In Defence of a Minimal Conception of Epistemic Contextualism : a Reply to M. D. Ashfield’s Response
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2013
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Acta Analytica. 2013, 28(1), pp. 127-137. ISSN 0353-5150. eISSN 1874-6349. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s12136-012-0168-y
Zusammenfassung
Abstract The article responds to the objections M.D. Ashfield has raised to my recent attempt at saving epistemic contextualism from the knowability problem. First, it shows that Ashfield’s criticisms of my minimal conception of epistemic contextualism, even if correct, cannot reinstate the knowability problem. Second, it argues that these criticisms are based on a misunderstanding of the commitments of my minimal conception. I conclude that there is still no reason to maintain that epistemic contextualism has the knowability problem.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Epistemic Contextualism; Minimal Contextualism; Knowability Problem; Factivity Problem; Scepticism
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
FREITAG, Wolfgang, 2013. In Defence of a Minimal Conception of Epistemic Contextualism : a Reply to M. D. Ashfield’s Response. In: Acta Analytica. 2013, 28(1), pp. 127-137. ISSN 0353-5150. eISSN 1874-6349. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s12136-012-0168-yBibTex
@article{Freitag2013-03Defen-41378, year={2013}, doi={10.1007/s12136-012-0168-y}, title={In Defence of a Minimal Conception of Epistemic Contextualism : a Reply to M. D. Ashfield’s Response}, number={1}, volume={28}, issn={0353-5150}, journal={Acta Analytica}, pages={127--137}, author={Freitag, Wolfgang} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41378"> <dc:creator>Freitag, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>In Defence of a Minimal Conception of Epistemic Contextualism : a Reply to M. D. Ashfield’s Response</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Abstract The article responds to the objections M.D. Ashfield has raised to my recent attempt at saving epistemic contextualism from the knowability problem. First, it shows that Ashfield’s criticisms of my minimal conception of epistemic contextualism, even if correct, cannot reinstate the knowability problem. Second, it argues that these criticisms are based on a misunderstanding of the commitments of my minimal conception. I conclude that there is still no reason to maintain that epistemic contextualism has the knowability problem.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Freitag, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41378"/> <dcterms:issued>2013-03</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-15T14:28:54Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-15T14:28:54Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja